Friday Jul 11, 2025
NEWSLETTER
www.israelhayom.com
  • Home
  • News
    • Israel
    • Israel at War
    • Middle East
    • United States
  • Opinions
  • Jewish World
    • Archaeology
    • Antisemitism
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Culture
  • Magazine
    • Feature
    • Analysis
    • Explainer
  • In Memoriam
www.israelhayom.com
  • Home
  • News
    • Israel
    • Israel at War
    • Middle East
    • United States
  • Opinions
  • Jewish World
    • Archaeology
    • Antisemitism
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Culture
  • Magazine
    • Feature
    • Analysis
    • Explainer
  • In Memoriam
www.israelhayom.com
Home News Israel Politics Political Commentary

Why did we get dragged into a repeat election?

The attorney general's decision to publish a document detailing the counts on which PM Netanyahu is suspected comprised clear intervention in the democratic process by the judicial system.

by  Jacob Bardugo
Published on  08-25-2019 15:53
Last modified: 08-25-2019 16:08
Why did we get dragged into a repeat election?Marc Israel Sellem, Gideon Markowicz

Blue and White leader Benny Gantz and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu | Photo: Marc Israel Sellem, Gideon Markowicz

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Stop for a minute and think about how, exactly, we got found ourselves holding a repeat election. The banal answers will sway from a loss of seats for the Right due to the camp fracturing to Yisrael Beytenu leader Avigdor Lieberman's insistence on ending the coalition negotiations to his satisfaction. These are correct assessments, but shallow ones. The current political crisis is the result of an unprecedented event in Israeli politics, and mainly the legal system intervening in the democratic process.

Let's lay it all out on the table: If Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit had not published the document detailing the crimes Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is suspected of less than two months before the election, we wouldn't have found ourselves here. The results of the election created the impression that the publication had not affected the public's opinion. That's a mistake. In effect, the publication of the suspicions against Netanyahu decided the rules of the game and especially how the various political actors would make decisions – and therefore, how the public would decide.

Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter

From the moment that Netanyahu was marked as "accused," an atmosphere developed that placed clear boundaries on everyone involved. If a natural coalition partner like Kulanu leader Moshe Kahlon promised he would not serve as a minister in the government of a prime minister under indictment, what could we expect from opponents like Yair Lapid or Avi Gabbay? It's hard to know how the seats would have shaken down if the suspicions against Netanyahu hadn't been published, but it's clear that Netanyahu would have had much more latitude in the coalition negotiations. The Israeli party system lost its flexibility – that is the major significance of Mendelblit and State Attorney Shai Nitzan's decision, inspired by former Chief Justice Aharon Barak.

The decision to publish the list of counts on which Netanyahu is suspected was not merely procedural. It didn't just happen at a critical point in time. The opposite – the timing of the publication was a subject of debate. Was it appropriate to notify the public about them before, or after, the election? And there were solid grounds for the debate: On one hand, perhaps the public should have been provided with vital information. But on the other, if a history of investigations and indictments against public officials that ended in nothing wasn't enough to tip the scales against publishing the suspicions early, then at least the fact that Case 4,000 – defined by Nitzan as a "test case," – should have held them back.

But Mendelblit didn't make the decision alone. As Channel 12 reporter Guy Peleg revealed at the start of January, the "brainstorming process" brought it all sorts of former officials in the judicial system and former chief justices Dorit Beinisch and, of course, Aharon Barak. Former senior officials in the judicial system lined up in favor of publishing the suspicions against Netanyahu before the election. And as Barak expected, Mendelblit did not disappoint.

By pushing for the document to be published before the election, the judicial system interfered with democracy, not to decide who would be prime minister, but to help everyone else understand who would not be. They didn't disappoint, either. But it could be that the current election is indicative of a trend in the opposite direction: Kahlon has joined the Likud, and most of the other players aren't in any rush to set down in stone whether they will or will not join a Netanyahu-led government. It seems that they've also realized that the public doesn't have too much faith in the judicial system.

Related Posts

Netanyahu warns 'Iranian-style' term-limit bill undermines electionsReuters/Ammar Awad

Netanyahu has not changed, but he sounds different. What happened? 

by Mati Tuchfeld

The former prime minister’s candid rhetoric during a recent political event stunned even his closest allies. What is behind the...

'I intend to be everyone's president'

President Herzog intends to smash political impasse

by Ariel Kahana

Like his father did in 1984, when a unity government turned out to be one of the best Israel ever...

Can Israel avoid early elections?Oren Ben Hakoon

Can Israel avoid early elections?

by Amir Ettinger

Bennett and Lapid can ask the president to dissolve the Knesset on the grounds it is disrupting the function of...

Menu

Analysis 

Archaeology

Blogpost

Business & Finance

Culture

Exclusive

Explainer

Environment

 

Features

Health

In Brief

Jewish World

Judea and Samaria

Lifestyle

Cyber & Internet

Sports

 

Diplomacy 

Iran & The Gulf

Gaza Strip

Politics

Shopping

Terms of use

Privacy Policy

Submissions

Contact Us

About Us

The first issue of Israel Hayom appeared on July 30, 2007. Israel Hayom was founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better, more balanced and more accurate journalism. Journalism that speaks, not shouts. Journalism of a different kind. And free of charge.

All rights reserved to Israel Hayom

Hosted by sPD.co.il

  • Home
  • News
    • Israel at War
    • Israel
    • United States
    • Middle East
    • Sports
  • Opinions
  • Jewish World
    • Archaeology
    • Antisemitism
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Culture
  • Magazine
    • Feature
    • Analysis
    • Explainer
    • Environment & Wildlife
    • Health & Wellness
  • In Memoriam
  • Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Submit your opinion
  • Terms and conditions

All rights reserved to Israel Hayom

Hosted by sPD.co.il

Newsletter

[contact-form-7 id=”508379″ html_id=”isrh_form_Newsletter_en” title=”newsletter_subscribe”]

  • Home
  • News
    • Israel at War
    • Israel
    • United States
    • Middle East
    • Sports
  • Opinions
  • Jewish World
    • Archaeology
    • Antisemitism
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Culture
  • Magazine
    • Feature
    • Analysis
    • Explainer
    • Environment & Wildlife
    • Health & Wellness
  • In Memoriam
  • Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Submit your opinion
  • Terms and conditions

All rights reserved to Israel Hayom

Hosted by sPD.co.il