Commentary

Nasrallah's infamous speech following the IDF's withdrawal from Lebanon in 2000, once thought prophetic, crumbles in the face of Israeli resolve.

Friday's brilliant strike led Syrian rebels to fight for Assad's ouster, Iranian dissidents pushed for Khamenei's demise, and Saudi social media lit up with calls against Houthi leaders. Now Israel can use this momentum to strike a hostage deal.

Israel's actions against Hezbollah, culminating in Nasrallah's assassination, along with the continued pounding of Hamas, have restored much of its deterrence and respect in the Middle East. Now, Israel must charge towards the next objective – eliminating Iran's nuclear program.

Hassan Nasrallah knew three fundamental reasons why Israel is hesitant to attack, but didn't understand that these values have evaporated over the past year.

IDF leaders confirm readiness while the cabinet weighs strategic implications, the question is – when will it happen?

  On Monday evening, Sept. 23, I had the honor of attending Aish’s inaugural Roundtable Dinner and Discussion at the...

If there is one legitimate criticism of Israel, apart from not fighting back more vociferously, it is that it did not develop a weapons industry of its own and instead relied upon fair-weather friends (and bitter enemies, too) such as in the Democratic Party in the US.

For the last 30 years, Israel has responded to attacks by its enemies, not with the kind of overwhelming force that it once used to subdue its enemies, but with compromises, concessions, or haphazard military operations. This strategy has led to one disaster after another.

Anyone outraged over an operation that targets terrorists simply can't stand the sight of Jews defending themselves.

The IDF was like a coiled spring that had been waiting a long time for the green light. But we must define an exit strategy to avoid being dragged into a never-ending war.