As the high-profile criminal trial of former President Donald Trump in New York nears its conclusion, a potential guilty verdict could unleash a cascade of historic legal and political consequences.

Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, stands accused of 34 felony counts related to allegations that he falsified business records to conceal hush-money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election. While Trump faces several other criminal investigations, this Manhattan case represents the first to reach a jury verdict and could be the sole legal matter resolved before voters head to the polls.

The trial has featured testimony from Trump's former confidant Michael Cohen, who claims the former president personally approved the reimbursement scheme at the heart of the charges. However, Cohen's credibility has been called into question due to his own history of dishonesty and criminal conduct.

Regardless of the outcome, Trump has preemptively framed the case as a political witch hunt, sowing the seeds for his response – be it claiming vindication or perpetuating a narrative of victimhood. Yet a conviction would mark an unprecedented blemish on a presidential campaign and could further complicate Trump's legal jeopardy if he reclaims the White House.

As this uncharted territory looms, several critical questions arise – here is everything you need to know: 

Could Trump still run if convicted?

Yes. The Constitution's requirements for presidential eligibility do not explicitly prohibit candidates with felony convictions from running or holding office. Legal experts assert that states cannot impose additional qualifications beyond the federal criteria.

Would Trump face incarceration?

 It's possible but not guaranteed. While the charges carry potential prison terms of up to four years each, judges often opt for probation and fines over jail time for first-time, non-violent offenders. Trump's advanced age, lack of prior record, and status as a former and potential future president could factor into the sentencing judge's calculations.

Could Trump appeal?

Almost certainly. Trump would likely pursue appeals through New York's state court system, a process that could easily extend past the 2024 election.

Would Trump retain the right to vote? 

Potentially. Under New York law, incarcerated individuals cannot vote, but those on probation maintain their voting privileges. If Trump avoids jail time through either a non-custodial sentence or a protracted appeal, he would likely be eligible to cast a ballot.

How might this impact Trump's other cases?

 While a conviction would not directly affect Trump's separate indictments in Florida, Georgia, and Washington, D.C., it could shape public perception, influence potential juries, and factor into future sentencing decisions. Prosecutors may also wield a guilty verdict to challenge Trump's credibility.

As this legal imbroglio unfolds, the ramifications of the imminent verdict could fundamentally reshape the frontiers of presidential politics for years to come.

The post Will Trump be convicted or acquitted: This is how it could shape the 2024 election appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter

The report quoted judiciary spokesman Gholamhossein Esmaili and identified the two men as Masoud Mosaheb, the co-chairman of the Iran-Austrian Friendship Society, and Shahram Shirkhani.

Mosaheb was accused of sharing information on "nuclear and missile projects" with Israel and the German intelligence service. Shirkhani allegedly spied for Britain, gathering "sensitive information" in Iran's banking and defense sectors and tried to enlist government staff in his efforts.

The judiciary spokesman, Esmaili, recently said that five employees of the foreign ministry, energy industries, and other companies had been detained. He did not elaborate at the time but Mosaheb and Shirkhani were not apparently arrested much earlier.

Iran occasionally arrests and convicts those accused of spying on behalf of foreign countries, including the US and Israel.

In July, Iran executed Reza Asgari, a former defense ministry employee convicted of spying on behalf of the Central Intelligence Agency, and also Mahmoud Mousavi Majd, a member of the Revolutionary Guard convicted of providing information to the United States and Israel about the top Guard General qasem soleimani who was later killed in a U.S. drone strike in Baghdad in January

In June, Iran hanged Jalal Hajizavar, also a former staffer of the defense ministry, after he had admitted in court he was paid to spy for the CIA.

And in 2016, Iran executed a nuclear scientist convicted of spying for the United States.

Subscribe to Israel Hayom's daily newsletter and never miss our top stories!

The post Iran sentences 2 men to prison over spying for Israel, West appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

Netherlands-born Oussama Achraf Akhlafa, 24, was found guilty of membership of a terrorist organization. He fought with ISIS in Mosul, Iraq and Raqqa, Syria, between 2014 and 2016.

Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter

Prosecutors had sought a sentence of seven years, eight months.

The court said Akhlafa had posed smiling next to the crucified body of a man who had been executed by ISIS, and had posted the picture on Facebook.

"He violated the personal dignity of the deceased, thereby breaching the Geneva Convention," the court said, in a reference to the treaties protecting the rights of war victims.

Akhlafa was tried under so-called universal jurisdiction, which enables war crimes to be prosecuted regardless of where they were committed, in the first trial in the Netherlands dealing with war crimes committed by an ISIS member.

A second defendant, Dutch-born 24-year-old Reda Nidalha, was sentenced to 4.5 years in prison for membership in a terrorist organization.

The post Dutch court convicts ISIS member for war crimes appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.