While authoring the official memoirs of Jalal Talabani, the President of Iraq post-Saddam Hussein's downfall in 2003, I had the distinct opportunity to spend an evening at the Presidential Palace. That night, which featured a dinner attended by US officials from President George W. Bush's administration, offered me profound insights into the dynamics of international diplomacy. During this event, Dr. Latif Rashid, who now serves as Iraq's President, introduced me to one of America's most esteemed military generals.

Our conversation took an intriguing turn when he discovered I was a Kurdish Iranian studying in the United States. Intrigued by my background, he asked, "Why is the Islamic Republic our adversary?" Responding with youthful enthusiasm, I asserted that despite political tensions, the Iranian people hold a deep affection for America.

This question has lingered in my thoughts for over two decades, echoing within the corridors of power in Washington, D.C. It remains a topic of intense debate among the nation's elite political, military, and security circles. Reflecting on the era when Iran, under the leadership of King Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, was a staunch US ally during the height of the Cold War, it becomes painfully clear that the gratitude typically expected from such alliances was conspicuously absent from the White House.

Today, nearly half a century after the tumultuous events of 1979, the United States continues to grapple with the complex challenge of "Islamic terrorism." Despite the enduring efforts of America's distinguished statesmen and military leaders who opposed totalitarian regimes and later staunchly defended the global fight against terrorism post-September 11 – a conflict that claimed the lives of thousands of American servicemen and women –the threat of Islamic extremism remains alarmingly potent.

This ongoing challenge is exacerbated by the current administration's diplomatic engagement with regimes that support terrorism, apparently disregarding the ideological underpinnings of the Wilayat al-Faqih – a Shiite theocracy fundamentally opposed to democratic values. This pattern of engagement underscores a persistent misunderstanding within US foreign policy, highlighted by a significant oversight when, as of 1979, no CIA Middle East specialist had fully engaged with the writings of Khomeini.

Adding to these strategic errors, the Defense Intelligence Agency once optimistically predicted that the Shah of Iran would remain in power for another decade – an assertion not just incorrect but indicative of a broader pattern of miscalculations that continue to influence US policy in the Middle East today.

The doctrine of Khomeinism, founded on Islamic terrorism, anarchism, and a profound antipathy towards Western civilization, starkly contrasts with the principles upheld by US presidents, who do not claim divine authority. In contrast, Iran's theocratic leaders, including Khomeini and his successor Khamenei, portray themselves as divine emissaries, wielding religious authority to legitimize their autocratic rule.

This governance model starkly contrasts with US democratic principles, where presidents are elected and operate under the rule of law. Iran's leaders, self-styled as Ayatollahs or 'Signs of God,' perpetuate a grand deception, presenting themselves as religious authorities while committing widespread human rights abuses under the guise of religious mandate.

Iran's current supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, has continued this pattern of antagonism, directing threats and insults at international figures, including ordering assassination attempts against President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while dismissing international diplomacy as mere bluster. Khamenei, a translator of works by Sayyid Qutb – considered the father of radical Islam into Persian – champions the legacy of Navab Safavi, a noted terrorist of the Fada'iyan-e Islam, viewing him as a guide and a vanguard of their resistance. His regime's interpretation of 'Islam,' 'resistance,' and 'jihad' as justifications for terrorism and violence against Western interests and allies highlights a severe misalignment with global peace efforts.

Since 1979, the pattern of US leaders writing to Iran's dictators has often stemmed from misguided attempts to influence through liberal ideology, sometimes leading to significant diplomatic blunders, such as Reagan's infamous Iran-Contra affair. More recently, engaging with a regime that has supported numerous terrorist groups and seeks the destruction of Israel with the help of groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, PKK, Islamic Jihad, the Houthis, and the Popular Mobilization Forces, serves no constructive purpose. Such overtures fail to advance the interests of the US or its allies and instead underscore a dangerous lack of strategic clarity.

As history continues to unfold, it is crucial for US policymakers to choose wisely, balancing strategic interests with ethical considerations, to support the right side of history for the benefit of future generations. Whether Democrat or Republican, the next steps taken by US leadership could redefine the Middle East's geopolitical landscape, potentially ushering in an era of genuine peace and cooperation.

The post The real Iran appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

Israel has not had and does not have a war with the people of Iran. Generally, the Iranian historical nation also has no enmity or war with Israelis. The Islamic caliphate of the Shiite Jurist (Velayat-e-Faqih) is seeking a civilizational war with Israel and wants to destroy the West, civilization, and modernity with savagery and Islamic terrorism.

Regrettably, the Iranian people are also victims of vicious and barbaric rulers who have tied the name of civilized Iran and monarchy to Islamic terrorism for 45 years, and perhaps for many years after the collapse of the mullahs' regime, this shame will remain for the name of Iran due to crimes, oppression, and savagery, and gradually the Iranian nation will restore the name of Iran to its historical credit and reputation.

In the public opinion of patriotic Iranians, no one is with the mullah's regime, and no one has been or is seeking war. But the warmongering mullah and criminal ayatollahs, from the very first day, based the destructive ideology of Khomeinism on this terrorism, terror, horror, and destruction. Israel has no choice but to break the bones of the Iranian regime for its survival and existence, a warmongering ideological regime that has so far fired hundreds of missiles and drones toward Israel and incited thousands of Islamic terrorists against the innocent people of Israel under different names cunningly. Naturally, Israel does not accept this humiliation the Shiite mullah fires against it from time to time. The one responsible for this destruction and turmoil in the Middle East region is none other than a savage and arrogant mullah named Ali Khamenei, who is willing to sacrifice all of Iran and Iranians for his absurd ideology. Khamenei is someone who has translated the book of the father of Islamic terrorism (Sayyid Qutb) into Persian, and the terrorist organization of the Muslim Brotherhood has been among his supporters. Khamenei is someone for whom homeland, nation, and country have no importance; he is an agent of the country's destruction. For Khamenei, only the transnational network of Islamic terrorism and the Shiite crescent hold importance, not the welfare of Iran or its citizens.

In response to the terrorist and missile attacks by the Islamic Republic, the Israeli government and Mossad currently face several options:

1. Refrain from showing an immediate and serious reaction and focus on cutting off the terrorist arms of the Islamic Republic over time. This, due to Israel's reputation, is a reaction that is humiliating and degrading for the Jews.

2. Eliminate the officials of the Islamic Republic or target the hated and corrupt military and political villains and thugs within the Velayat-e-Faqih who have taken a historical nation hostage. The immediate aftermath may involve a few days of propagandistic displays and political posturing, but no one will shed a tear for Islamic terrorists, and it might even spark a national uprising against these thugs and remove the shadow of war from the Iranian people's beloved land. This war is not the war of the Iranian nation and Israel, it is the war and savagery of the Islamic Republic regime. The elimination of any of the terrorist officials of the Islamic Republic will certainly bring joy to the Iranian nation, and humiliation to the religious dictatorship. Weakening the Islamic Republic's power structure could have far-reaching consequences, potentially leading to a fundamental reshaping of the regional order. The removal of the regime's influence might pave the way for increased regional stability and security, as the absence of its destabilizing actions could allow for more peaceful interstate relations. The disintegration of the Islamic Republic is also one of the wishes of the states of the Persian Gulf region, which are Israel's new allies. Just as no one shed a tear for Haniyeh and Nasrallah, the elimination of Khamenei and the villains of the IRGC and MOIS or Quds Force will have no result other than a wave of pride.

3. Destroy nuclear and chemical facilities, electrical and military infrastructure, and economic mafias of the Revolutionary Guards. The only playing card of the Islamic Republic is this Islamic terrorist network under the name of Islamic resistance, but certainly, if the terrorist mullah obtains nuclear weapons, it will be a great loss for Israel and the land of the Jews. Twice this savage and delusional and warmongering regime in Iran has fired hundreds of missiles against Israel, therefore if it had an atomic bomb it would certainly have fired that too. Basically, the Shiite mullah display no shred of conscience when it comes to their crimes and savagery.

The Islamic Republic, by provoking its transnational terrorist networks and increasing tension, has been openly seeking a full-scale war for years, but the world had closed its eyes and ears to seeing and hearing this reality. It has become clear to the US military, American intelligence institutions, and Israel that the Islamic Republic has neither military nor intelligence capabilities. It does not have the courage and ability to face military confrontation, and certainly, China and Russia will not interfere for the sake of savage mullahs against America, the West, and Israel. Israel is forced to terminate this cancerous tumor, and both Democrats and Republicans will stand behind Israel. The US military and security institutions have suffered hundreds of casualties due to the warmongering of the terrorist-loving mullahs since 1979, but the White House has never dared to openly express the desire for a change in leadership in Iran. This statement has always been among the forbidden words or taboos in Washington, although American military and intelligence commanders are in constant communication with Israel and know that peaceful coexistence with the Shiite mullah is impossible.

But Israel has a better understanding of the essence of the mullahs' republic. It knows that it has only remained based on three principles: foreign propaganda, internal repression, and foreign servitude. Mossad does not adjust its strategy because of the upcoming US elections, since it knows that the government in Tehran is anti-human, anti-peace, anti-stability, and anti-tranquility. To guarantee survival, Israel has no choice but to remove this threat, now that the Islamic Republic is also a weak mafia and corrupt, isolated, hated government without popular support. The Islamic Republic's downfall is now more imminent than at any other point in history. The intensity of Israel's military attack will change the equation in the Middle East. And the more the Islamic Republic is humiliated and its impotence is displayed, the fiercer the flames of internal uprisings in Iran will burn. Then, the Iranian nation will choose their desired government themselves. Currently, the primary goal of the Iranian nation and Israel is to destroy the mullahs' regime. In these sensitive historical days, Israel is a partner of the distressed Iranian nation.

It is a golden opportunity that history has given to Israel to address concerns about the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. It will certainly destroy the Islamic Republic's nuclear program at this historical juncture, and it may be the only historical opportunity for Israel! With the destruction of military capabilities, and nuclear facilities, and the elimination of Islamic Republic officials, the Islamic Republic will disappear like snow in summer. A large part of the Iranian people will finish the work with a national uprising. After breaking the terrorist arms of the Islamic Republic in the region, such as Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Hashd al-Shaabi, this government with the illusion of a nuclear program will not get anywhere.

The post Israel's war with the world's terrorist supreme leader appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

In a surprising move that has caught the attention of political analysts and citizens alike, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently addressed the Iranian people directly, bypassing the Islamic Republic's brutal leadership. This unprecedented communication highlights the complex and evolving dynamics in the Middle East, particularly the relationship between Israel, Iran, and the broader region.

Netanyahu's message, while ostensibly aimed at fostering goodwill with the Iranian populace, serves multiple strategic purposes. It attempts to drive a wedge between the Iranian people and their government, asserting that the regime's priorities do not align with the interests of ordinary Iranians. By emphasizing the potential for peace and prosperity in a post-Islamic Republic era, Netanyahu is subtly encouraging internal dissent and presenting Israel as a potential ally to the Iranian people.

However, this message comes at a time of heightened tensions in the turbulent region. The recent elimination of key terrorists in Iran's "Transnational Terrorist Network," including Hezbollah's leader Hassan Nasrallah, has significantly altered the strategic landscape. These developments have not only weakened Iran's regional influence but have also exposed vulnerabilities in its network of proxy Islamic terrorist groups.

The timing of Netanyahu's address is crucial. It coincides with a period of internal strife in Iran, marked by economic hardships and growing public discontent with the regime's policies. By highlighting the regime's expenditure on foreign conflicts and nuclear ambitions at the expense of domestic well-being, Netanyahu aims to exacerbate these internal tensions.

From a security studies perspective, this approach can be seen as a form of psychological warfare. It's an attempt to influence Iranian public opinion and potentially create internal pressure on the Iranian government. The effectiveness of such a strategy, however, depends on various factors, including how widely the message is disseminated within Iran and how the Iranian public perceives it.

Netanyahu's assertion of Israel's military capabilities and reach serves a dual purpose. It's both a warning to the Iranian regime and an attempt to project strength to the Israeli public and the international community. By mentioning the elimination of figures like Mohammed Deif and Hassan Nasrallah, Netanyahu is signaling Israel's willingness and ability to act against perceived threats, even beyond its immediate borders.

The message also touches on a vision of a post-Islamic Republic Iran, painting a picture of potential cooperation and peace between Israel and Iran. This forward-looking approach is designed to appeal to Iranians' aspirations for a better future and to position Israel as a potential partner rather than an eternal enemy.

However, it's crucial to approach Netanyahu's message with a critical eye. While it presents a compelling narrative, it also simplifies complex historical and geopolitical realities. The longstanding animosity between Iran and Israel is rooted in more than just the policies of the current Iranian outlaw regime. Cultural, religious, and historical factors play significant roles in shaping these relations.

Moreover, the message's effectiveness in reaching and influencing the Iranian public is questionable. Iran's tight control over media and internet access means that many Iranians may never hear Netanyahu's words. Those who do might view them skeptically, given the long history of hostility between the two nations.

From Iran's perspective, this message could be seen as an attempt to interfere in its internal affairs. The Iranian criminal mullah's regime has long accused foreign powers, particularly Israel and the United States, of trying to destabilize the country. The regime could use Netanyahu's direct address to the Iranian people to reinforce this narrative and potentially strengthen nationalist sentiments.

The broader implications of this message extend beyond Iran-Israel relations. It signals a shift in Israel's approach to regional politics, moving from a policy of containment to one of active engagement, albeit with the Iranian people rather than the government. This strategy aligns with broader efforts to reshape the Middle East's political landscape, including normalizing relations between Israel and several Arab states.

Netanyahu's message presents opportunities and challenges for the international community, particularly the United States and European powers. While it aligns with Western interests in curbing Iran's nuclear ambitions and regional influence, it also risks escalating tensions in an already volatile region.

The elimination of key figures in Iran's proxy network, if confirmed, marks a significant shift in the balance of power in the Middle East. It potentially weakens Iran's ability to project power beyond its borders and could lead to a reassessment of its regional strategy. However, it also raises the risk of retaliation and further escalation of conflicts.

As we analyze these developments, it's important to consider the human cost of ongoing conflicts and tensions in the region. The people of Iran, Israel, and neighboring countries continue to bear the brunt of geopolitical maneuvering and proxy wars. Any path forward must prioritize the safety, security, and prosperity of all people in the region.

In conclusion, Netanyahu's message to the Iranian people represents a bold but risky diplomatic maneuver. It reflects the changing dynamics of Middle Eastern politics and the ongoing struggle for regional influence. As the situation continues to evolve, it will be crucial for all parties involved to navigate these choppy waters with caution, always keeping in mind the potential for both conflict escalation and opportunities for peace.

The coming months and years will likely see further shifts in the regional balance of power. How Iran's terrorist-loving regime responds to its weakened position, how Israel navigates its newfound strategic advantage, and how other regional and global powers react will shape the future of the Middle East. In this complex geopolitical chess game, the moves made today will have far-reaching consequences for future generations.

Finally, Netanyahu and Israel are held in high regard among the people of Iran. This is partly because he invited Iran's Prince Reza Pahlavi to Israel and also due to Israel's destruction of terrorists linked to the mullahs, which has brought joy and amusement to the Iranian people. As a result, social media in Persian is filled with unique praise for Netanyahu and Israel, with some even viewing Netanyahu as a significant ally in the success of regime change in Iran. This clearly reflects the deep divide between the terrorist regime and the honorable and noble people of Iran, a fact that has certainly not gone unnoticed by Netanyahu.

The post Netanyahu's bold but risky diplomatic move appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

The structure of the mullahs' regime in Tehran, notorious for its proliferation of terror, operates multiple terrorist groups across the Middle East. Regrettably, there is a palpable lack of genuine intent among both regional countries and Western powers, notably the United States, to dismantle this pernicious force.

Ironically, these same nations engage in negotiations and even promote these malign actors in Western media, contributing to a disconcerting normalization of terror. Western media outlets frequently refer to figures like Ali Khamenei with the undeserved title of "Ayatollah," which translates to "Sign of God." This irony begs the question: Which divine being would sanction terrorism that Khamenei represents?

Engaging with terrorists – malevolent individuals who thrive on chaos and destruction – yields no benefits. Yet, we observe years of fruitless Western negotiations with the mullahs' regime in Tehran, adorned with photo ops that symbolize these diplomatic failings. Despite losing hundreds of soldiers in the fight against terrorism sponsored by the Islamic Republic of Iran and enduring terrorist attacks on their own soil, Europe and America seem to lack a lesson learned.

The West fails to recognize how its actions embolden the regime, even as the Islamic Republic continues its international campaign of terror, kidnapping, embassy attacks, and other provocations. It is unclear what further atrocities the Islamic Republic must commit to awaken the world from this oversight. The intelligence and military apparatus of the Islamic Republic cunningly crafts narratives or fabricates irrelevant and false rumors that find their way into Western media, furthering their agenda. Even American think tanks and universities grant platforms and positions to known terrorists, a troubling testament to a misguided understanding of freedom of expression. As if the more murderous and criminal you are, the more popular you become. Even the families of Islamic Republic officials freely roam in the West and America. These oversights and naïveté have rendered the global landscape perilously insecure.

The Islamic Republic's terror network, akin to a plague, spreads across the Middle East, Europe, Africa, and Latin America. Yet, the 21st-century world seems paralyzed by indecision on how to address this threat. The persistence of radical Islam and Islamic terrorism poses one of the greatest threats to global peace, yet there remains a significant segment of the international community that turns a deaf ear to these realities. World-renowned intelligence agencies like the CIA spend months on end prioritizing peace talks over decisive action against terrorist entities like Hamas. It appears future generations may look back on our era astonished at our appeasement of bloodthirsty terrorists. This century, however, seems bereft of answers.

The Islamic Republic maintains clandestine diplomatic channels with both the US and Israel while simultaneously orchestrating terror attacks globally. It seems the regime holds the world hostage, playing a dangerous game with global stability. Even as Tehran engages in public diplomacy, it fosters a network of terror that destabilizes regions far beyond its borders.

However, the Islamic Republic lacks the defensive and military capability to confront the US and Israel. China and Russia, along with their puppet North Korea, manipulate their servants in Tehran. However, Tehran continues its enmity towards America, the West, and Israel. The White House, over recent years, has shown a lack of strategic initiative to counter the Tehran regime's destructive influence.

Iranian lobbyists, apologists, and stooges operate freely in Washington, further complicating the narrative and enabling the regime's propaganda machine, funded unwittingly by American taxpayers. In actuality, The Islamic Republic's lobbies in Washington are actively operating, and even Persian-language media funded by American taxpayers, supposedly to promote democracy, are under the control and influence of the Islamic Republic. These agents broadcast their propaganda on television and radio from Prague and Washington to Los Angeles.

The Islamic Republic has mobilized all its terrorist branches. Shiite terrorists affiliated with Iran in Iraq have initiated drone attacks on Israel, and Hezbollah has started launching rockets. Both actions are instigated by the IRGC and Quds Force under Khamenei. In recent days, the Islamic Republic awaited the end of Arbaeen and the ideological display it entails. As soon as that curtain falls, the next stage of warfare and missile and drone launches will commence.

It seems that the officials of the Islamic Republic derive psychological satisfaction from threatening Israeli and American officials with death in front of the media. Essentially, the psyche of terrorists is restless and unhealthy. A regime thirsty for bloodshed, lawlessness, explosions, destruction, and displays of savagery does not understand the language of diplomacy. Peaceful coexistence with it, in today's world, is impossible.

It is unrelated to the culture, history, and civilization of the Iranian people. In fact, the mullahs, with the help of terrorists, have occupied Iran. Today, as the Islamic Republic orchestrates a broad spectrum of terror, the world watches, waiting for the next act in this grim theater of war. The question remains: How long will the international community tolerate the existential threat posed by the regime in Tehran?

Today, global news agencies, like the showcasing of a new action movie in cinemas worldwide, vividly reflect news related to the warmongering of the Islamic Republic and its terrorist branches like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, and Popular Mobilization Forces. They prepare for public mourning for the potential elimination of Hamas and the killing of its leaders in Tehran, accompanied by critiques filled with advice and vain hopes for peace.

Israel has no choice but to surgically remove this malignant growth for its survival, but the snake's head is in Tehran, and until its head is cut off, this futile spectacle continues. The world, amidst Islamic terrorists, is restless, and the situation does not bode well. It is time for the global community to wake up and take decisive action. The stakes are too high, and the cost of inaction is too great. We must confront this menace head-on, with all the tenacity and resources at our disposal, before it further engulfs the world in its dark shadow.

The post Wake up, negotiations with Iran are pointless appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

In recent years, the Islamic Republic of Iran has faced a series of escalating confrontations with Israel that have left the regime humiliated and increasingly vulnerable. Despite the fiery rhetoric and threats emanating from Tehran, the regime's inability to respond effectively to Israel's provocations has exposed deep fissures within its military-security apparatus and highlighted its broader strategic failures. As the corridors of power within Iran's ruling system, the Velayat-e Faqih, scramble to determine a course of action, it is becoming increasingly clear that the regime is at a critical crossroads – one where any misstep could lead to its sudden and catastrophic collapse.

At the heart of the Islamic Republic's ideology lies the destructive doctrine of Khomeinism, built on hollow slogans, intimidation, terrorism, and an obsessive focus on anti-Israel and anti-American rhetoric. Over the past 35 years under the tyranny of Khamenei, and the preceding 10 years under Khomeini, the regime's core leadership has relentlessly worked to expand its network of transnational terrorism. They have pursued the creation of a Shiite empire at any cost, unleashing chaos across the Middle East. In every terrorist operation, countless Israeli and American soldiers, as well as Europeans, have lost their lives. Behind the scenes, despite the public displays of hostility, clandestine negotiations with the United States continue through specific lobbying channels.

This regime's ultimate aim is to propagate Shiism and construct a nuclear-armed Shiite empire. To preserve its grip on power, it is willing to commit any atrocity. The path to regime change in Iran will be fraught with challenges, but it is essential for the stability of the region and the world. For Israel, confronting Islamic terrorism and the terror networks tied to the Islamic Republic is a matter of survival. However, if the world fails to support regime change in Iran, the cost will be high. The unchecked spread of radical Islam and Islamic terrorism across the globe is but one of the many dangers. The religious octopus that fuels this terror has its head in Tehran – a wild, 85-year-old cleric who holds the fate of the region in his grasp.

The roots of the regime's current paralysis lie in a complex web of internal conflicts, strategic miscalculations, and a pervasive fear of the superior military power of Israel and its ally, the United States. The Iranian regime, long reliant on its network of Islamic terrorism and proxy groups to project power across the region, now finds itself with few viable options. The internal discord within the regime's military and security sectors has further weakened its ability to present a united front against external threats. This lack of cohesion is compounded by the regime's failure to coordinate effectively with regional powers and countries on which it depends for support, leaving it increasingly isolated on the international stage.

One of the most glaring issues facing the regime is its inability to accurately assess different scenarios and their potential consequences. The leadership in Tehran has repeatedly underestimated the costs and ramifications of its actions, leading to a series of strategic blunders. This is particularly evident in its dealings with Israel, where the regime's threats and displays of anger have done little more than expose its impotence. The regime's fear of engaging directly with a militarily superior Israel, coupled with the realization that any conflict could quickly spiral out of control, has left it in a state of strategic paralysis.

The regime's limited options for action are further constrained by the growing discontent within Iranian society. Decades of oppression, economic mismanagement, and corruption have eroded the regime's legitimacy, and the Iranian people, weary of the endless cycle of conflict and repression, are increasingly unwilling to rally behind the government's foreign policy adventures. This lack of popular support has left the regime isolated, not only internationally but also domestically, further limiting its ability to respond to external threats.

Since July 31, eight days have passed, and the regime's leadership remains paralyzed, unable to formulate a coherent response to Israel's latest provocations. The corridors of power within the Velayat-e Faqih system are filled with confusion and disorientation, as the leadership grapples with the realization that it is no longer in control of its own destiny. The regime's fear of entering into a direct conflict with Israel is palpable, as the leadership understands that such a move could lead to the sudden collapse of the entire government. The power structure in Iran now stands at a crossroads, uncertain which direction to turn and whether or not to take the gamble of war.

The current crisis is a stark reminder of the inherent instability of authoritarian regimes. For decades, the Islamic Republic has ruled through a combination of repression, ideological manipulation, and strategic alliances with regional powers. However, the regime's ability to maintain control is increasingly being called into question. The internal conflicts and strategic miscalculations that have plagued the regime in recent years are not merely isolated incidents but rather symptoms of a deeper, systemic failure.

As the regime's leadership contemplates its next move, it must grapple with the harsh reality that its options are rapidly dwindling. The era of impunity, where the regime could act without fear of significant repercussions, is coming to an end. The strategic environment in the Middle East is shifting, and the Islamic Republic is no longer the dominant player it once was. The regime's fear of Israel's military power, combined with its inability to galvanize domestic support for its foreign policy, has left it vulnerable and exposed.

In the end, the Islamic Republic's current predicament is a reflection of the broader challenges facing authoritarian regimes worldwide. Such regimes, by their very nature, are prone to strategic miscalculations and internal discord. Their reliance on repression and ideological control to maintain power often blinds them to the realities of their strategic environment, leading to catastrophic failures. For the Islamic Republic, the crossroads at which it now stands represents a moment of truth – a moment where the regime must decide whether to continue down the path of confrontation or to seek a new, more pragmatic approach to its foreign policy.

The inevitability of history suggests that regimes that fail to adapt to changing circumstances are doomed to collapse. The Islamic Republic of Iran, with its rigid ideological framework and increasingly isolated position, may soon find itself on the wrong side of history. As the regime's leadership grapples with the decision of whether to engage in a potentially suicidal conflict with Israel, it must also confront the possibility that its time in power may be drawing to a close. The crossroads at which the regime now stands is not just a strategic dilemma but a moment of existential crisis – one that will determine the future of the Islamic Republic and its place in the world.

The post Iran's crossroads: A regime paralyzed by its own failures appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

Since the Islamic-Marxist revolt of 1979, the Khomeinist mullahs' regime in Iran has consistently pursued a policy of exporting its riotous ideology. Central to this strategy is the support and sponsorship of various Islamic terrorist groups around the world. This not only destabilizes the Middle East but also poses significant challenges to global peace and security. At the forefront of this terror network is Hezbollah, the Iranian regime's most formidable proxy.

Hezbollah, a notorious transnational criminal organization, is Iran's most powerful Islamic Terrorist proxy. Dominating Lebanon, committing terror attacks worldwide, and posing a significant threat to Israel with its substantial arsenal of missiles and rockets, Hezbollah exemplifies the Iranian regime's strategy of using terrorism to further its ideological and geopolitical goals.

Global reach of Hezbollah

Iran's support has enabled Hezbollah's thugs to establish an extensive terrorist infrastructure far beyond the Middle East. In Europe, Hezbollah has created numerous sleeper cells and was responsible for the 2012 bombing in Bulgaria that targeted Israeli tourists. In Latin America, the group's influence is growing, with concerns about potential attacks and increased power in the region. Hezbollah's operations have also extended into Africa, further showcasing the group's global reach and Iran's ambition to exert influence worldwide.

In the turbulent Middle East, Hezbollah is a key player in the Iranian axis of terror, actively participating in conflicts in Syria, Yemen, and Iraq. In Syria, Hezbollah fighters support the Assad regime, contributing to the ongoing humanitarian crisis. In Yemen, the Houthi rebels, supported by Iran and aligned with Hezbollah, have launched missiles and drones into Saudi Arabia and the UAE, even attacking ships in the Red Sea at Iran's behest.

Hezbollah's aggressive and terrorist actions, along with those of other Iranian-backed Islamic terrorist groups, have eroded the sovereignty of various states in the Middle East. In Lebanon and Iraq, these terrorists often operate independently of national governments, significantly weakening the authority of these states. The destabilization caused by Hezbollah and its allies perpetuates instability and conflict, causing untold suffering to civilians caught in the crossfire.

The conflicts perpetuated by Iran and Hezbollah have exacted a heavy humanitarian cost. Countless civilians have been killed or displaced, and the suffering inflicted is immeasurable. The international community must unite to confront the threats emanating from Tehran and take decisive action to dismantle the savage mullahs' regime. The collapse of Iran's terrorist regime and accountability for its criminal leaders would be a triumph for humanity.

The axis of resistance: A threat to global security

The so-called "Axis of Resistance," primarily involving Iran, the Assad regime in Syria, and Hezbollah, represents a formidable terrorist alliance. This alliance's anti-Western, anti-Israeli, and anti-Saudi ideology fuels its actions. The origins of this axis trace back to the 1979 Iranian revolution, which sought to export its revolutionary ideology and support like-minded terrorist movements globally.

The US military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq post-9/11 inadvertently nurtured the growth of extremist Islamic terrorist groups, including ISIS which has organic ties with Iran's regime. The Iranian regime capitalized on this, falsely portraying itself as a counterforce against radical entities, thus consolidating its influence. The 2006 Second Lebanon War between Israel and Hezbollah further solidified Iran's "resistance front," demonstrating its ability to disrupt the status quo and create chaos.

The upheavals associated with the Arab Spring presented another opportunity for Iran. Under the pretext of countering ISIS, Iran supported various terror groups, fueling the growth of the Axis of Resistance. Today, this axis constitutes a direct threat to regional stability and global security. If not countered, it will lead to more chaos, terrorism, and war.

Regional cooperation is central to countering the Islamic terrorist axis. Middle Eastern countries must unite to demand regime change in Tehran and address underlying grievances. The international community must reconsider past decisions and take decisive action against Iran's nuclear program and terrorist activities. If the mullahs' regime continues its monstrous behavior, the Middle East's security framework will unravel, potentially leading to a regional nuclear arms race. The world stands on the brink of a perilous quagmire that could engulf it at any moment.

In conclusion, Hezbollah, as Iran's terror machine, represents a critical threat to global security. The international community must recognize the urgent need to dismantle this terror network and hold the Iranian regime accountable for its actions. Only through collective effort can we hope to achieve lasting peace and stability in the Middle East and beyond.

On October 7, 2023, Khamenei and the Quds Force incited Hamas against Israel and then involved the Houthis in the conflict. Today, Hezbollah is yet another puppet of the despised regime of the mullahs. Unfortunately, there is no serious intent or will within American institutions to support regime change. Israel's reaction is driven by the need for survival. The Islamic Republic of Iran is a problem for everyone, and until the White House realizes that the malignant tumor of the mullahs' regime must be surgically removed, just like communism and apartheid, the 21st century will continue to witness the crimes of Islamic terrorism, with the head of the snake being in Tehran. Unless it is destroyed, this grim story will persist.

The post Hezbollah's partners in global terrorism appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

In the Islamic Republic of Iran, a landscape once rich with cultural and political heritage now suffers under the yoke of an authoritarian regime that has hijacked the once-sacred act of voting. The disenfranchised Iranian populace finds itself ensnared in a system where elections serve as nothing more than a spectacle of faux democracy, orchestrated to sustain the illusion of legitimacy for a government that has systematically eroded civil liberties and human rights.

The recent overwhelming boycott of the presidential elections is not merely a passive act of defiance but a pronounced indictment of a regime that has failed its people spectacularly. This boycott transcends mere political disillusionment; it is a profound statement against the regime's propaganda machine that paints participation as a civic duty while, in truth, it is a coerced endorsement of a predetermined outcome.

Within this context, the roles of presidential candidates become clear. Figures such as Jalili and Pezeshkian, perceived by the public not as pioneers of change but as stalwarts of the status quo, are emblematic of a broader political malaise. They are seen not as legitimate contenders for leadership but as cogs in a machine engineered by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. His regime, epitomized by a relentless grip on power, manipulates every facet of governance – from the judiciary to the military – to ensure that no true opposition can emerge.

Ali Khamenei himself stands as a paragon of dictatorial excess, embodying the antithesis of the democratic values he purports to uphold. His plans to establish a dynastic succession through his son, Mojtaba, reveal a blatant disregard for democratic processes and a preference for monarchical rule disguised as religious governance. This maneuver is not just a perpetuation of personal power; it is an affront to the collective will of the Iranian people, signaling that even the semblance of choice is a privilege granted by the ruling elite, not a fundamental right.

The boycott, therefore, is a critical expression of political maturity and historical consciousness by a society that, despite being shackled by fear and repression, recognizes the futility of participating in a predetermined play. Over the decades, Iranians have cultivated a sophisticated understanding of their political landscape, informed by repeated cycles of promised reforms followed by inevitable retrenchment. This has led to a collective awakening, where the electorate refuses to validate a corrupt system through participation in its rigged elections.

The implications of this silent boycott extend beyond the immediate context of electoral politics to touch upon the very legitimacy of the regime. The 'vilayat-e faqih' system, which centralizes religious and political authority in the hands of the Supreme Leader, is fundamentally incompatible with the principles of democratic governance. It perpetuates a model of leadership that is inherently despotic, reminiscent of historical caliphates where rulers wielded absolute power, unaccountable to their subjects.

This model of governance has not only stifled political dissent but has also led to economic stagnation and social decay. Iran's economy, heavily sanctioned by the international community and mismanaged by corrupt elites, teeters on the brink of collapse. The regime's failure to effectively address these issues, combined with its oppressive tactics to suppress any form of dissent, has only deepened the resolve of the Iranian people to seek change.

The reformist factions within Iran, including groups like the Islamic Left and participants of the 1979 revolution, once heralded as agents of change, now find themselves in a precarious position. Their calls for reform, constrained within the parameters set by the regime, have failed to bring about any substantive change. Instead, they serve to perpetuate a facade of progress, even as the fundamental structure of the regime remains unchallenged.

As the regime continues to clamp down on dissent and tighten its authoritarian grip, the response from the populace has been one of increasing resistance. The silent boycott is not just a refusal to vote; it is an active strategy of non-compliance that challenges the regime's authority and exposes its vulnerabilities. This growing undercurrent of civil resistance is a testament to the resilience of the Iranian people, who, despite enduring decades of repression, are increasingly determined to imagine and fight for a future that aligns with their aspirations for freedom and justice.

In conclusion, the silent boycott of the elections in Iran represents more than a momentary expression of discontent. It is a profound challenge to a regime that relies on suppression and deception to maintain control. For the international community and observers of Iranian politics, this act of boycott is a crucial indicator of a shifting political consciousness among Iranians, a sign that the authoritarian grip of the regime is faltering under the weight of its own contradictions. As this political drama unfolds, it becomes increasingly clear that the path to genuine reform in Iran must be paved with the active participation of its citizens, demanding and implementing a system of governance that truly represents their will and respects their rights.

The post Iran's authoritarian rule gets a silent boycott appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

Iran finds itself on a dangerous downward spiral. Governance has led the country into complete deadlock. The situation in Iran has become a complex, inextricable knot, with governance accelerating destructively and absolutely, placing Iran's existence under the threat of complete destruction. The situation in Iran is extremely concerning.

Yet, Iranian society and the world still do not fully comprehend the depth of this disaster. Since the springless winter of 1979, the regime has acted as an exploiter and occupier. The oppressive political system continually repeats its mistakes without any intention of correction.

The dreams of the Iranian nation and its governance are not aligned The Tehran government, with its unchecked power and immense wealth, fails to recognize the identity and name Iranian nation, who deeply resent this governance. This tension and conflict will continue until the regime's fall.

The Iranian nation is governed by an outlaw regime that rejects rational dialogue, opting instead for repression through whips, bullets, and batons. However, the governance, acting like an unyielding horseman, has no intention of dismounting. From atop its horse, it lashes out with clubs and whips or shoots bullets at all the pedestrian citizens.

The military governance operates like a mafia, after 45 years, continuing its repression while the regime's propaganda machinery works overtime. All propaganda tools serve to bolster the regime's authority. All platforms are under the control of the regime, which still seeks to consolidate its power. Relative to the potential of its people, Iran's governance is backward, incapable, and fraught with countless deficiencies. It holds no esteem among the Iranian people and is isolated on the international stage. The regime knows it has no national standing among Iranian society, especially the younger generation. The barrier between the governance and the nation is not just the outdated, bankrupt, and Khomeinist ideology.

A governance that tramples on the interests of the nation, denying the interests of everyone but itself. There is no unity in society; everything is damaged and cracked. Now, the oppressive and absolute evil regime, among an alienated and dissatisfied Iranian society, has no legitimacy or popularity. The government's discourse has also faced failure.

With its irrelevant language and logic, the regime demands that society be submissive, viewing itself as the guardian overall, even grandiosely claiming to lead the Muslims of the Milky Way galaxy. How can one reason with a ruler who, after 35 years, only understands the language of force? None! The regime always points its finger of threat at everyone. Society cannot breathe freely. The government recognizes voting, civil rights, and freedom of speech only for its supporters and inner circle. The governance cannot tolerate dissenting voices or differing opinions. This governance and system are not open to the future; they are very closed, dark, unwise, and irrational.

Intellectualism in Iran deals with terror, imprisonment, and absolute deprivation. The absolute evil governance in Iran has neither the desire nor the ability to understand anything beyond itself. A governance that is populist, repressive, and absolutist on one side, and a protesting, suppressed, and wholly lost society on the other are in conflict and opposition. There is no understanding or dialogue except through interrogations, revolutionary courts, and threatening calls from the Ministry of Intelligence and other security institutions. Indeed, no one in Iranian society is safe from arrest, suppression, and threats.

On the other hand, the current regime in Iran has utterly failed and is a symbol of absolute evil. Therefore, peaceful coexistence with this savage governance is impossible. The current regime does not recognize the people of Iran as a nation but sees them as the Islamic Ummah, and Iran for the regime is like war spoils, as if the country is occupied. But in fact, the Islamic Ummah is thousands of miles away from the Iranian nation, and it must be said that the Shiite regime and the Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist are not the Iranian nation. It must be said that the regime's narrow-minded politics and literature are completely contrary to the society and nation of Iran. In total, it is a failed system that contradicts freedom and law. It continuously suppresses but lacks authority.

The poor, suppressed, hopeless, and deprived society of Iran feels a deep dissatisfaction, public hatred, and both overt and covert anger towards the regime. The reason for the behavior of Iranian society is that after 1979, people lost their national pride and their national identity to the mullahs, leading the country into deadlock, downfall, and decay.

A governance in power that cannot understand language and has whips and bullets is a savage oppressor that is ready to commit any crime to preserve its irrational, non-modern, reality-averse, and deaf governance, and it is not ashamed of

committing crimes. And the tragedy of the matter is that the mullah governance, with its sophistry and fallacy, claims religiosity and heavenly status, which is actually a display of superstitions and delusions and emptiness for political and religious fraud. Although Iranian society has moved beyond religion, a governance that calls the terrorist uproar of 1979 a revolution, but the bitter story of 1979, if it was a revolution, was a display of the savagery of Khomeini and his associates who returned Iran to 1400 years ago.

A few harsh and oppressive people are ready to sacrifice all of Iran for their invalid opinion and belief. The current religious despotism and religious governance in Iran expect the entire society to respect the terrorist uproar of Khomeini and also that the entire society should have the temperament of slavery and servitude and absolute obedience. And the structure of the Guardianship is the embodiment of despotism, delusion, ignorance, and superstition.

The path to institutionalizing democracy in Iran is also a long, rocky road full of ups and downs. A dangerous and threatening outlook awaits the Iranian nation. The regime is in decline. It is possible that soon, similar to economic and cultural collapse, environmental and industrial and agricultural collapses, a social and ethical collapse will also occur in Iran that can no longer be controlled.

Throughout history, the institution of the mullahs or the Shiite mullah system has been full of power-seeking, deception, law evasion, lies, propaganda, corruption, and terror and suppression. Change in this institution is impossible. Now, the Tehran regime has two tools: internal suppression and external aggression. The regime's terrorist institutions such as the Ministry of Intelligence, the IRGC, the police force, the Quds Force, and the army, as well as other proxy groups in the Shiite crescent to transnational criminal organizations, will continue their work as long as this regime is in power. The death of President EbrahimRaisi and others will not change or affect the system of this regime.

Predicting the situation in crisis-stricken Iran is challenging, especially with the elections commencing this Thursday as candidate registrations begin. However, I must state that: 1. There will be no enthusiasm, participation, or competition in these elections. The atmosphere is severely restricted within a quasi-caliphate structure, and the government shows no interest in public involvement. 2. Amidst the media frenzy, the role of the Guardian Council, under Khamenei's supervision, is overlooked. 3. Candidate approvals will be limited to a few radical figures loyal to Khamenei. 4. The government aims to continue the current harsh conditions and seeks someone akin to Raisi.

The post Behind the Islamic Iron Curtain appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

President Ebrahim Raisi's death is not significant. It doesn't matter to Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei or the clerical regime either. From the perspective of the Iranian people, his presence or absence makes no difference. However, the government's failure to locate him for several hours – if not due to serious deliberate sabotage – indicates the incompetence of the Iranian regime.

Before delving into the elation and satisfaction of the majority of Iranians, it is crucial to address the current state of Iran. The military and security forces are primarily focused on handling the situation to prevent it from spiraling out of control. Khamenei, too, has called for prayers and contemplation, which suggests that this is no ordinary incident but rather an extraordinary and alarming development. Iran is on the verge of boiling over, with societal anger reaching levels beyond comprehension, and stands at the threshold of another wave of nationwide protests. However, the question remains: would Raisi's death intensify this wave?

The depth of the tragedy lies in the fact that Iranians can envision no future other than a disaster for their depleted and exhausted nation. An autocratic regime rules over Iran, transforming its rebellious and pain-stricken populace into a graveyard, plundered and ravaged. The regime's pretense of power abroad is taken lightly by no one. A decrepit regime, fundamentally misplaced in the 21st century, operates more as a kleptocracy than a government – a lawless band of irrational and predatory figures in power. This despotic and plunderous governance is merely a ruthless force wielding an iron fist, intimidating and flexing its muscles through fear and terror.

The enduring truth in the world of politics is that a government of murderous, brute, ignorant, and fanatical death merchants, an Islamic regime with a regressive and repressive nature, achieves nothing. Before the astonished eyes of the world, a complex of deceit, regression, fraud, malice, ugliness, crime, and stupidity governs the battered and afflicted Iran. In essence, a vast conglomerate of crime and folly – a government inept and incompetent, repressive, corrupt, and zealously religious – rules over Iran. Our beloved country, enduring endless miseries and chaos because of a demonic presence occupying the seat of power, is shattered. Iran's tragedy cannot be overlooked. 

The regime, out of breath, defeated, and bankrupt, still gruesomely sacrifices its youth; wielding the scythe of death, it sanctifies murder. This nightmare of the Iranian nation, this death-creating factory, continues the age-old tradition of the clerical school – engaging in detestable slaughter and reveling in its lethal decline. The concerted efforts of a government of fear, irrationality, and violence are to preserve, at any cost, an ugly, barbaric, and dark regime. Of course, a segment of the population, indoctrinated and traditional, still remains under the sway of these religious profiteers. Even the "gray zone" – thousands of Iranians who have disconnected from the living world – has realized that the government is aggressive, merciless, engaging in imprisonment, torture, and abductions, a death squad sending thousands to slaughterhouses and black sites. A storm of revelations, accusations, and denunciations pervades Iranian social networks.

For 45 years, the house of Iran has been burning. If no remedy is found to extinguish the fire, nothing of Iran will remain. The courageous and realistic young generation no longer accepts that this divine governance is sacrosanct and that rebellion against it is akin to rebelling against God. They have realized that former Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's proclamations on Feb. 5, 1979, were nonsensical. What the young Iranians miss is not the mullah's superstitions – the illogical and unacceptable religious tales – but their identity, pride, and the true image of Iran.

Iran, regressed, bloodied, and in mourning – disheartened, weary, bewildered, and hungry today, a nation afflicted and completely lost – must pass through this tunnel of horror and the consequences of the clerical regime's collapse. Fortunately, millions of bewildered Iranians, storm-born and shipwrecked, have grasped the meaning of Persian poet Hafez's poem: "A dark night, fearful of the wave, and such a dangerous whirlpool." The nation is no longer idle and does not want to be the shield for the calamity of the Islamic caliphate and the clerical executors of disaster-wielding clubs. The club-wielding members of Hezbollah and Tharallah, with their rhetoric of anger and usurpation, and their practice of drawing swords and committing murder – groups that have viciously attacked the Iranian nation throughout history – are sealing their own fate 

The notorious and dishonorable government of the mullahs – with a blatant sneer at the entire civilized world – reminds us of the Arab Age of Ignorance, but the mullahs or useless scavengers are nearing the end of their dream. No longer can a mullah mobilize millions under the guise of followers, aping through lies, deceit, and trickery; no longer can a mullah mobilize millions under the guise of followers, aping through lies, deceit, and trickery, because the people have recognized the vile nature of the wild mullahs, being the enforcers for 520 years.

This aggressive, vengeful, and spiteful group – devoted to destruction and execution – wanted to lull Iranians into a cradle of ignorance and superstition, but the Iranian society – driven by patriotic ideals, has instead followed the epic Shahnameh of Ferdowsi, not the religious explanations of Khomeini. Indeed, throughout Khomeini's writings, there is no mention of Iran, its culture, or its history. The ruling apparatus is alien to Iran's history, civilization, and culture and has established a government of God on Earth, not for Iran and Iranians but for their own void ideology: exporting Islamic terrorism and Khomeinism worldwide, plundering Iran's wealth, resources, and benefits. The social fabric of Iran is intertwined with the civil values of the Iranian people.

The trapped and bewildered people of Iran, enclosed within the walls of an Islamic prison, are earnestly and patriotically making efforts to break these ancient chains. Fortunately, there is a widespread opposition movement against Iran's current government, striving with all its might for the liberation of the country. Although historically, people do not spontaneously rise up, and uncalculated, unplanned, and uncoordinated uprisings are easily suppressed, fortunately, the Iranian people in these years have been forged in the crucible of adversity and have matured politically. They know that in this chaos, they cannot wait for a miraculous hand to emerge and act. Indeed, in the tumultuous history of the country, the Iranian nation has seen many floods and storms. The nation, always a creator of epics, has consistently preserved this ancient history, which is a proud reality of our past. Iran, throughout the centuries and across the expanse of history, has echoed its name. According to a clear and unequivocal historical fact, Iran is part of the ancient history of humanity because the light triumphs over darkness, and the undeniable reality of our history is that ancient Iran and its ancient culture have always been victorious.

The post Raisi's demise is the Iranian people's shred of hope appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

Unfortunately, American students and some of their defenders often do not fully understand what they are advocating for. Their lack of awareness of radical Islam, Islamic terrorism, fanaticism, Khomeinism, Shiite terrorism, the Muslim Brotherhood, or the transnational terrorist networks creates a fertile ground for the spread of harmful ideologies. This chaotic situation has historical roots in American universities that date back several decades.

During the 1960s and 1970s, Marxist-Leninist leftists, together with Islamic leftists in America, mounted significant protests against the late Shah of Iran, who was, at that time, the United States' most steadfast ally in the Middle East. In an ironic twist of history, Jimmy Carter praised Khomeini, and the White House went as far as to call him a "holy man." This marked a drastic and consequential shift in international relations and internal policies in Iran.

Following the tumultuous events of 1979, Iran, a nation with a rich civilization spanning 7,000 years, fell victim to a regime of religious and political Islamic tyranny. This not only endangered its own cultural heritage and population but also posed a significant threat to the stability of the Middle East and global security at large. In Washington, a severe miscalculation occurred; the administration believed that by playing the "Islamic card," radical Islam could be manipulated to act as a bulwark against the Soviet Union. This naive belief overlooked the fact that many Islamic terrorist groups, including those led by figures like Yasser Arafat, were already collaborating with Soviet interests.

This gross underestimation allowed a radical ideology to break free of its regional confines and assert itself on the global stage. The ideology of Khomeinism, empowered by Western miscalculations, took the world by storm. Ironically, Khomeini's regime began its international campaign with an act of aggression – hostage-taking – which directly contradicted the expectations of those like Carter who had supported him.

Within the United States, several academics and students became deeply entangled with the ideologies of the Muslim Brotherhood and Khomeinism. Far from being mere observers, these individuals were actively engaged in spreading the doctrines that supported the regimes they admired. This not only sowed seeds of discord but also betrayed a profound ignorance of the destructive nature of the ideologies they espoused.

Over the past 45 years, the repercussions of these ideologies have been dire. Wars, chaos, and political instability have become more prevalent, replacing what were once opportunities for peace and cooperation. The educational systems, meant to be bastions of learning and enlightenment, have instead sometimes become platforms for preaching and defending reactionary and destructive ideologies. This has not only undermined the academic integrity of these institutions but also compromised the future of many young Americans who remain largely unaware of the true nature of the forces molding their perceptions.

Today, the dictator of Iran, Khamenei, continues to exploit these ideological vulnerabilities. His regime, characterized by its brutality and suppression of dissent, finds perverse satisfaction in the turmoil evident in American universities. The recent protests in Iran, which resulted in the death of 700 people and the blinding and imprisonment of hundreds more, starkly illustrate the regime's ruthless tactics. Yet, these atrocities seem to find some echo among American student groups that unwittingly champion the causes of such a regime.

This phenomenon raises pressing questions: Do these students truly understand the nature of the forces they support? Are they aware of the implications of their actions? It is crucial to recognize that the support for entities like Hamas and the display of Hezbollah flags not only contravene US laws, which categorically reject terrorism but also threaten the very principles of American democracy.

The infiltration of radical Islamic ideology into US and European educational and cultural institutions is extensive. These entities have been active not just in universities but also in media, lobbying groups, research centers, think tanks, and even religious institutions. This long-term engagement poses a severe risk to the democratic fabric of American society, a risk that is compounded by the widespread nature of this infiltration and the subtlety with which it operates.

Moreover, the international media, which could play a critical role in educating and informing the public about these dangers, often falls prey to the same propaganda it ought to critique. The influence of what some might call the "media mafia" – entities that propagate terrorist ideologies under the guise of news and information – continues to mislead the dynamic and creative young generation. This manipulation leads to radicalization, which if unchecked, could have dire long-term consequences for global peace and security.

Furthermore, the ideological battle between radical Islamists and the West is not confined to military or physical confrontations; it is a deeper, more pervasive war that seeks to undermine social norms, cultural heritage, and historical narratives. The youth in America, influenced by these sinister forces, are often caught up in disturbances that risk not only their future but also the stability and security of the nation they call home.

To the youth of America, and indeed to all who value democracy and freedom: it is imperative to look closely at the lessons history offers. Iran, once a beacon of culture and prosperity, now lies in ruins, a stark testament to the destructive power of radical ideologies. The Iranian people live in a state of perpetual turmoil, their resources squandered on sustaining terrorist activities that have brought them nothing but suffering and despair.

Before 1979, the Shah of Iran stood as a friend and ally to America, representing a bulwark against the spread of Soviet and radical influences. However, his overthrow, facilitated by international leftist groups and Islamic fanatics, opened the door to a regime that has consistently fostered terrorism and oppression. As we reflect on these developments, it becomes clear that the challenges we face are not just about combating overt acts of terrorism. They are about recognizing and countering the subtle, pervasive spread of an ideology that seeks to destroy from within. It is about standing firm against propaganda, recognizing the true nature of our enemies, and ensuring that the values of liberty and democracy are upheld. The struggle is daunting but essential for the preservation of our way of life and the protection of future generations.

Be vigilant and informed. The rights to freely practice religion, speak openly, publish, and assemble are fundamental to our democracy but must not be abused to support the very ideologies that seek to destroy it. We must not allow the noble intentions of these freedoms to be manipulated to propagate harmful ideologies like Khomeinism or to support the baseless claims of autocrats like Khamenei.

In this critical moment, let us recall the wisdom of our Founding Fathers and strive to protect the principles they established. Observing the misuse of these freedoms to promote terrorism and radical ideologies, particularly in educational institutions like Princeton where Hezbollah flags have been seen, is deeply troubling. These actions betray the principles upon which our nation was founded and on which it must continue to stand.

God save America from these threats, both seen and unseen, and empower us to remain vigilant defenders of our cherished freedoms.

The post US universities face a battle of minds appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.