At this critical historical moment, the future of Iran – and by extension, the entire Middle East – hangs in the balance. The world is facing three distinct scenarios:

1.The survival of the Islamic Republic

2.The fragmentation of Iran

3.The restoration of a united, sovereign monarchy under king Reza Pahlavi.

Only one of these options can deliver true peace, long-term security, and regional balance for Israel, the United States, and the broader international community.

Scenario 1: If the Islamic Republic Survives

Should the Islamic Republic endure, the consequences will be devastating and far-reaching: escalated military threats to Israel through continued funding of Hezbollah, Hamas, and Islamic Jihad; a real risk of nuclear weapon acquisition; strengthening of the Russia-China-Iran authoritarian axis, weakening Western influence; persistent proxy wars in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, and potentially the Caucasus; export of militant Shi'ism and destabilization across the region

This scenario poses a direct existential threat to Israel and represents the erosion of American geopolitical and moral leadership in the Middle East.

Scenario 2: If Iran is fragmented

Some Western and regional voices naïvely promote the idea of dividing Iran along ethnic or sectarian lines. This approach would create multiple unstable, rival states, prone to internal conflict and external manipulation; a power vacuum filled by terrorist groups like ISIS, Al-Qaida , or Iran-backed militias; destabilization of neighboring countries: Turkey, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, and the Gulf states; and new battlefronts for global powers to compete over influence and control.

For Israel, a fragmented Iran removes a historical counterweight to Turkish and Islamist ambitions. For the United States, it creates another endless conflict zone – worse than Afghanistan, larger than Syria, and richer in oil and gas. For Israel: Restoring monarchy under Reza Shah II offers a rare and viable pathway to regional security and international alignment: end to anti-Israel ideology and existential hostility; total severance from proxy terrorist groups; quiet strategic cooperation and mutual deterrence; and renewal of historic ties with Iranian Jews and cultural exchange.

For the US: replacement of a hostile regime with a pro-Western partner (with King Reza Pahlavi); containment of Chinese and Russian influence in the Gulf and Central Asia; a peaceful, non-military transition led by the Iranian people. stabilization of global energy markets; and a human rights victory and democratic model without boots on the ground.

For the region: a revived power balance among Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel; an end to the "Shi'a Crescent" project and sectarian proxy wars'; formation of a secular alliance for peace and development across the Middle East; cultural and economic reintegration of Iran into the global system.

Reza Shah II: The only viable national anchor

King Reza Pahlavi is a national symbol of unity, stability, and continuity. He stands above partisanship and ideology, commanding trust across ethnic, secular, and religious lines. His leadership ensures:

Iran will not be partitioned. The Islamic Republic will not return. The window of peace will not be lost

Iran is on the verge of change – whether through collapse or transformation. The choice is not between reform and revolution. It is between chaos or stability, darkness or renewal. For Israel, for the United States, and for the world, there is only one rational choice – support a free, united, sovereign Iran under monarchy.

The post A united Iran under the King Reza Pahlavi: The final opportunity for strategic peace appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

In the shadowy corridors of international diplomacy, a dangerous game continues to unfold. The pursuit of a revived nuclear deal with Iran – or any form of diplomatic normalization with the Islamic Republic – represents not statesmanship, but a profound betrayal of principles. The evidence speaks for itself: Each diplomatic overture has yielded only more terrorism, more executions, more conflict.

Let us be clear: The Islamic Republic of Iran stands not as a reformable government but as a theocratic dictatorship fundamentally built upon violence and repression. Engaging in negotiations with such a regime doesn't constitute diplomatic engagement – it provides dangerous empowerment. And it is the Iranian people who bear the terrible cost.

When Western powers extended the olive branch in 2015, what did they receive in return? The record shows terrorist expansion throughout the Middle East, missiles and drones transferred to Russia for deployment in Ukraine, hundreds of Iranian protesters killed with thousands more imprisoned, and an aggressive intelligence and cyber warfare campaign targeting democracies worldwide.

The billions released flowed not into infrastructure, education or healthcare, but directly into the coffers of Hezbollah, Hamas, the IRGC, and various foreign militias. The nuclear agreement didn't halt Iran's ambitions – it financed them.

For 45 years, the international community has awaited the emergence of a "moderate" faction within the Islamic Republic. Whether Khatami, Rouhani, or Raisi, the faces change while the fundamental reality remains unaltered. True power continues to reside with the Supreme Leader and his IRGC apparatus. This regime maintains its grip through execution, torture, propaganda, and regional warfare. The world must abandon the illusion that it can be reformed. The only viable solution is its removal.

Should the Islamic Republic retain power, the consequences are predictable: a nuclear-armed state sponsor of terrorism, ongoing existential threats directed at Israel, further devastation across Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Lebanon, continued massive human rights violations domestically, and global instability affecting energy markets and cybersecurity. Today's appeasement guarantees tomorrow's chaos.

The Iranian people aren't seeking military intervention. They demand justice – an end to tyrannical rule, not the commencement of another conflict. They desire not bombs, but freedom. Their position is unambiguous: Maximum pressure on the regime. Maximum support for the people.

What do Iranians truly desire? They seek freedom, democracy, a monarchy under King Reza Pahlavi, peaceful relations with Israel and Western nations, and a regional future built upon the values of Cyrus the Great – not Khomeini. They envision a Cyrus Accord – a renaissance of ancient friendship between Israel and Iran founded on mutual respect, human dignity, and peace.

The time for diplomatic equivocation has passed. History watches as we make our choice. Will we align with a blood-soaked dictatorship, or stand with a nation struggling to liberate itself from within? The Iranian people will ultimately change this regime. The question is whether the international community will prolong their suffering by helping the regime survive, or assist in the rebirth of Iran.

The post Stop negotiating with a bloodthirsty Islamic Republic; deal with the people of Iran appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.