Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, has a reputation for executing daring and innovative missions to protect the nation from terrorist threats. From taking down terrorist leaders to using unorthodox methods, the Mossad's operations have inspired movies, books, and TV shows. Here are four of the Mossad's wildest stories that showcase their strategic brilliance and unwavering commitment to justice.

Since its inception, Israel has faced threats from hostile neighbors, leading to the Mossad developing creative strategies to combat terrorism. One such strategy involved targeting terrorist group leaders to dismantle their operations. By using small, highly trained forces to assassinate key figures, the Mossad minimized civilian casualties and effectively disrupted terrorist networks.

The Mossad's operations have included some of the most daring and high-profile assassinations in modern history. One of the agency's most infamous missions was its response to the 1972 Munich Massacre. On September 5, 1972, eight gunmen of the Palestinian militant group Black September broke into the Israeli team's flat at the Olympic village in Munich, shooting two and taking nine Israelis hostage. West German police responded with a bungled rescue operation in which all nine hostages were killed, along with five of the eight hostage-takers and a police officer. The "Peace" Olympic games were meant to showcase a new Germany 27 years after the Holocaust but instead opened a deep rift with Israel. In what became known as Operation Wrath of God, the Mossad hunted down and eliminated those responsible, employing a range of ingenious tactics to track and eliminate their targets.

In 1973, the Mossad executed a bold operation in Beirut to eliminate key leaders of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) -- Muhammad Youssef al-Najjar (Abu Youssef), Kamal Adwan, Kamal Nasser. The strategy involved deploying troops from naval vessels onto Lebanon's shoreline. These soldiers would then make their way into Beirut, posing as vacationers. Once in the city, they would rendezvous with Mossad operatives who had prepared rental vehicles for their transportation to designated locations. To minimize suspicion, particularly when moving through Beirut during late-night hours, some commandos adopted female personas. This tactic was designed to make the group appear less conspicuous as they navigated the city streets around midnight. They managed to successfully take down high-ranking PLO officials, crippling the organization's infrastructure. Despite facing challenges during the mission, the Mossad's operatives accomplished their objectives with precision and stealth.

In 1978, the Mossad targeted Wadie Haddad, a prominent Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) co-founder known for orchestrating terror attacks. An RPG fired through his window had barely scratched him. A bomb dropped on a Beirut stadium had somehow missed him. Killing him at home was impossible because his wife and young children were always around. Unable to approach Haddad directly, the Mossad devised a plan to introduce a slow-acting poison into his toothpaste through a double agent. The poison gradually took effect, leading to Haddad's eventual demise.

Doctors suspected but could not prove that he had been poisoned. The PLO appealed to the Stasi, East Germany's secret police. But even the best doctors in East Germany couldn't save Haddad. His New York Times obituary reported the cause of death as cancer. Without Haddad, the PFLP dissolved, proving that targeted assassinations were the cleanest, most moral way to eliminate a threat -- without war or civilian casualties.

In 1996, the Mossad orchestrated the assassination of Yahya Ayyash, known as "The Engineer," who was responsible for constructing lethal explosive devices. A close associate of Ayyash was persuaded to cooperate with Israeli authorities. He was given a cellular phone by Israeli operatives, which contained both surveillance equipment and explosive material.

On the morning of January 5, Ayyash used this phone to answer a call from his father. Israeli surveillance aircraft in the area intercepted the conversation, confirming Ayyash's identity and location in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza. They detonated the bomb remotely without causing any harm to others.

In an ambitious mission to neutralize Khaled Mashal, the Deputy Head of Hamas's political Bureau, in Amman, Jordan, in 1997, the Mossad encountered unforeseen challenges that led to the exposure of their operatives. The plan was to poison him through an ultrasound device disguised as a harmless gesture: Meshal would feel a puff of damp air, and when he turned around, all he'd see were two bumbling tourists opening a well-shaken can of soda. The agents would apologize for spraying him and then return to Israel.

The incident unfolded as Mashal was being dropped off at the "Palestinian Aid Center," a front for Hamas operations. The Mossad operatives approached Mashal as he exited his vehicle. In a twist of fate, Mashal's young daughter got out of the car and ran after her father, inadvertently alerting his driver to the presence of the suspicious individuals behind Mashal. The driver's warning cry allowed Mashal to turn and confront his assailants as they were spraying the poison, which landed in Mashal's ear.

The operatives, caught off guard, fled the scene but were pursued by local Palestinian affiliates. A physical altercation ensued on the streets of Amman, drawing the attention of passersby and ultimately leading to the capture of the two men. Jordanian authorities detained the suspects. Initial attempts by the men to pose as Canadian tourists quickly unraveled under questioning, leading to a diplomatic crisis. The Israelis handed over the antidote and Mashal recovered quickly, in exchange for the two agents coming home, bruised but alive. Jordanian King Hussein bin Talal then suspended all ties with Israel, leaving six Israeli agents trapped in the embassy, which were traded for the release of Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin from an Israeli prison.

In conclusion, the Mossad's history is filled with daring and intricate missions that blur the lines between reality and fiction. The Mossad continues to uphold its mission of safeguarding Israel and pursuing justice against those who threaten its security. Beyond the high-profile assassinations, the Mossad has undertaken countless other missions that have remained largely unknown to the public. These include the rescue of hostages, the gathering of critical intelligence, and the disruption of terrorist plots. The agency's ability to operate with stealth and precision has earned it a reputation as one of the world's most elite and effective spy organizations. As new challenges emerge, the world can only speculate on the future endeavors of Israel's legendary secret agents.

The post Is Mossad the world's best spy agency? appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

In the realm of global nuclear politics, few topics are as contentious and shrouded in secrecy as Israel's nuclear capabilities. Despite widespread speculation and expert assumptions, Israel maintains a policy known as "amimut," or "deliberate ambiguity." This article delves into the intricacies of Israel's nuclear policy, its historical context, and the implications it holds for regional and global security.

What is amimut?

Amimut, the Hebrew term for "deliberate ambiguity," encapsulates Israel's approach to its nuclear capabilities. This policy is designed to keep both allies and adversaries guessing about the extent of its nuclear arsenal. Media outside Israel claim it could possess between 80 and 400 nuclear warheads, but Israel neither confirms nor denies these claims. This ambiguity serves as a strategic deterrent, particularly against hostile neighbors.

David Ben-Gurion, Israel's founding father, was reportedly obsessed with the idea of developing nuclear weapons. He viewed them as essential for the survival of the Jewish state. The early years of Israel were marked by a series of conflicts with neighboring Arab nations, which fueled Ben-Gurion's determination to secure a nuclear capability.

In collaboration with France, Israel embarked on a nuclear program that led to the establishment of two research centers: Dimona and Soreq.

During a crucial meeting in 1962 with President John F. Kennedy, Shimon Peres, then Israel's deputy minister of defense, articulated a statement that would define the country's nuclear stance: "I can tell you most clearly that we will not introduce nuclear weapons to the region, and certainly we will not be the first." This declaration marked the formal adoption of amimut as Israel's nuclear policy.

Despite differing opinions among other prime ministers like Golda Meir and Levi Eshkol, the essence of Peres' statement resonated deeply. By maintaining a stance of ambiguity, Israel effectively communicated its intentions without revealing its capabilities, allowing it to deter potential threats without provoking an arms race.

In the decades following the adoption of amimut, Israel's Arab neighbors grew increasingly concerned about the possibility of Israel possessing nuclear weapons. The uncertainty surrounding Israel's nuclear arsenal led to a climate of fear and speculation. This ambiguity played a crucial role in altering the dynamics of conflict in the region.

As Peres noted in his autobiography, "We learned there is tremendous power in ambiguity... Doubt was a powerful deterrent to those who desired a second Holocaust." The fear of a nuclear-armed Israel led to a decrease in overt military confrontations from neighboring states, as they weighed the potential consequences of engaging with a nuclear power.

The Samson Option

One of the more dramatic elements of Israel's alleged nuclear policy is what is referred to as the "Samson Option." This concept draws upon the biblical figure Samson, who famously brought down the Philistines at the cost of his own life. In the context of nuclear deterrence, this option implies that Israel would resort to nuclear weapons only in an existential crisis, potentially taking down itself along with its enemies. This concept underscores the seriousness with which Israel views its nuclear capabilities, framing them not as a tool for aggression but as a last line of defense.

Pros and cons of amimut

While amimut has its proponents, it is not without its critics. Detractors argue that this policy allows Israel to evade international scrutiny regarding its nuclear program. As one of the few UN member states not to sign the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), Israel's position raises questions about accountability and transparency.

Critics contend that the lack of openness hinders global efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation.

Supporters of amimut argue that abandoning this policy could lead to an escalation of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East. They maintain that revealing Israel's nuclear capabilities could trigger an arms race, particularly with Iran, which has been a focal point of concern for Israeli security.

Israel's primary objective is to prevent nuclear proliferation at all costs. This often means taking proactive measures, including military actions against perceived threats. For instance, Israeli forces have conducted airstrikes on nuclear facilities in Syria and Iraq to dismantle emerging nuclear programs.

The Stuxnet Operation

In the early 2000s, it is believed that Israel collaborated with the United States to develop the malware known as Stuxnet. This sophisticated cyber weapon targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, causing significant disruptions and delays in their nuclear program.

Such actions align with the overarching goal of amimut: to ensure that nuclear weapons remain out of the hands of hostile nations. While cyber operations may not be as overtly aggressive as military strikes, they reflect a strategic approach to national security that prioritizes secrecy and deterrence.

Conclusion

Today, the global landscape of nuclear weapons continues to evolve. Many countries are engaged in research and development related to nuclear capabilities, and while the threat of nuclear war may not be imminent, the potential for conflict remains. Israel's approach to nuclear deterrence is characterized by a level of secrecy that sets it apart from other nations.

Israel's policy of amimut has been a deliberate strategy to maintain peace and stability in a volatile region. The question remains: what would happen if Israel were to abandon this policy and disclose its capabilities? Such a move could suggest a dramatic shift in the security landscape, either indicating a new era of trust and cooperation or a heightened threat of nuclear conflict.

The post Why is Israel so secretive about nuclear capabilities? appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

Rabbi Joachim Prinz's journey from Nazi Germany to the forefront of the American civil rights movement is a remarkable testament to the power of standing up for justice. A fiery orator and a fearless leader, Prinz's life was driven by his commitment to fight against hatred and oppression. His legacy reminds us that silence in the face of injustice is the greatest crime of all.

Early life in Nazi Germany

Life for Jews in Europe has always been fraught with challenges. After gaining full rights as citizens in Germany, many Jewish families, including Prinz's, felt a sense of relief. However, this emancipation led to a troubling trend where many German Jews sought to assimilate into secular society, distancing themselves from their Jewish identity. For young Joachim Prinz, Judaism was almost non-existent. His father had renounced their Jewish heritage, and it was his mother who remained his only link to their faith.

After his mother's death, Prinz's connection to Judaism waned until he discovered Zionism. He secretly ordered Theodor Herzl's "The Jewish State," which ignited a passion for Jewish independence. This newfound pride in his Jewish identity propelled him toward a career in the rabbinate, even in the face of his father's opposition. By the time he graduated from rabbinical school, Prinz had become a charismatic speaker, drawing crowds to Germany's largest synagogues and restoring pride in the Jewish community.

As Hitler rose to power, the situation for Jews in Germany rapidly deteriorated. Prinz saw the writing on the wall and began warning his community about the impending dangers of Nazi antisemitism. Speaking out against the Nazis was perilous; he was hunted by the Nazi Secret Police, enduring arrests until he was ultimately expelled from Germany. This expulsion, while traumatic, turned out to be a blessing, as the German Jewish community would soon face unimaginable horrors in concentration camps.

Upon arriving in the United States, Prinz was invited by prominent American rabbis to settle in. Although he had visited before and was initially unimpressed by the rampant racism and social inequalities, he soon became a passionate advocate for civil rights. Prinz was deeply disturbed to find that some American Jews had adopted attitudes towards Black Americans that mirrored the racism they themselves faced. This realization fueled his commitment to ally with the African American community, a connection forged through shared experiences of oppression.

Joining the battle for racial equality

Rabbi Prinz's kinship with African Americans was evident as he witnessed the discrimination they faced. Segregation laws forced Black individuals to the back of buses, denied them service in restaurants, and required them to attend segregated schools. This parallel to his own experiences in Nazi Germany galvanized Prinz to take action. He reached out to Black religious and civil rights leaders, forging alliances that would prove crucial in the fight for equality.

When Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. emerged as a key figure in the civil rights movement, Prinz was inspired by his vision and invited him to speak at Jewish gatherings. Prinz didn't merely lend his voice; he marched alongside civil rights activists, participated in protests, and even picketed against segregationist policies at Woolworth's department stores. His activism was not just a political stance; it was a personal mission to combat injustice wherever it appeared.

March on Washington

The culmination of decades of struggle came to a head during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom in 1963. With over 250,000 people gathered at the Lincoln Memorial, this event marked a significant moment in American history. Rabbi Prinz stood among the leaders, moments before Dr. King's iconic "I Have a Dream" speech, delivering his own powerful message.

"The most important thing that I learned in my life is that the most urgent, the most disgraceful, the most shameful, and the most tragic problem is silence." His words resonated with millions, emphasizing the importance of speaking out against injustice. The March on Washington sent shockwaves across the nation and played a pivotal role in the eventual passage of the Civil Rights Act, which outlawed segregation and discrimination.

Despite the achievements of the civil rights movement, the aftermath of the March on Washington was not a panacea for racial tensions in America. The assassination of key figures like John F. Kennedy, Malcolm X, and Dr. King left a void that led to disillusionment and anger within the African American community. The initial unity between Jewish and Black activists began to fray as socio-economic conditions diverged.

Jewish-Black unity disintegrates

As Jews in the United States became more successful and assimilated, some activists began to view them through a lens of suspicion, painting them as oppressors. This shift strained the once-strong alliance that Prinz had worked so hard to build. The very racism he had fought against within Jewish communities became a flashpoint in Black-Jewish relations, complicating the fight for equality.

Rabbi Prinz faced increasing hostility as tensions escalated. His synagogue in Newark became a target for radical groups, and he, himself, was threatened. Yet, despite these challenges, Prinz maintained his belief in coexistence and solidarity. He continued to engage with the African American community, fostering relationships that transcended the growing divides.

Even as some factions within the Jewish community opposed his more universalist approach to Judaism, Prinz remained committed to his vision of equality. He understood that pursuing justice was a core tenet of Jewish values, and he refused to abandon that principle. His move to a safe suburb with his congregation did not diminish his commitment; he insisted that his new synagogue have no stained glass windows, symbolizing a desire for clarity and transparency in a world often clouded by prejudice.

Rabbi Joachim Prinz passed away in 1988, leaving behind a legacy that continues to inspire. Today, when the causes of marginalized communities can often feel at odds, Prinz's message of unity remains crucial. He believed that we are all each other's neighbors and that the greatest challenge we face is not hate itself, but the silence of the majority in the face of it.

The post The German Rabbi who fought for US civil rights appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

For decades, Hezbollah has entrenched itself in Lebanon, transforming the nation from a once-prosperous haven into a battleground for regional power struggles. This article delves into the historical and contemporary factors that have allowed Hezbollah to dominate Lebanon, exploring its origins, its ties with Iran, and the devastating impact it has had on the citizens of Lebanon.

The narrative of Hezbollah is deeply intertwined with the Islamic Revolution in Iran, spearheaded by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Khomeini envisioned a global Islamic revolution, starting with his homeland. His sermons ignited a fire of discontent against the Shah, leading to the Iranian Revolution in 1979. The secular state was replaced by a theocracy, and Khomeini aimed to replicate this model throughout the Muslim world.

Lebanon, with its complex sectarian landscape, became the perfect target. Once dubbed the "Switzerland of the Middle East," Lebanon was in chaos, engulfed in civil war. The Shia community, long marginalized, found a champion in Khomeini, who invested in Shia neighborhoods, providing essential services and infrastructure. This strategy garnered loyalty from the impoverished Shia population, paving the way for the formation of Hezbollah, or the "Party of God."

Hezbollah emerged as a response to the Israeli and Western presence in Lebanon during the 1980s. The group quickly established itself through violent confrontations, targeting Israeli forces and Western peacekeepers. Their manifesto, which affirmed loyalty to Khomeini, outlined their goals: expelling foreign troops, prosecuting political adversaries, and establishing an Islamic state.

By the end of the Lebanese Civil War, Hezbollah had positioned itself as both a militia and a political force. The 1990 truce allowed Hezbollah to retain its weapons under the guise of a resistance movement, solidifying its role in Lebanese politics.

Hezbollah's grip on Lebanon is maintained through fear and coercion. Citizens who dare to speak out face harassment, violence, and legal repercussions. The combination of brainwashing, intimidation, and brute force has created an environment where dissent is nearly impossible.

Hezbollah's rise was not solely a product of its own efforts; it benefited from the support of Syria, which intervened in Lebanon during the civil war. The two entities shared common interests, including hostility towards Israel and a commitment to maintaining power in Lebanon. However, the Lebanese populace grew weary of Syrian interference, culminating in the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005, which ignited widespread protests and eventually led to Syrian withdrawal.

The Second Lebanon War

In 2006, tensions boiled over into the Second Lebanon War. Hezbollah's abduction of Israeli soldiers triggered a devastating Israeli response that resulted in widespread destruction across Lebanon. Despite the chaos, Hezbollah emerged with bolstered support among its base, further entrenching its political and military positions.

Syrian Civil War

The outbreak of the Syrian Civil War in 2011 opened new avenues for Hezbollah's expansion. As the Syrian regime faced significant challenges, Hezbollah intervened, fighting alongside government forces. Their involvement included not only military support but also the establishment of new militias loyal to Iran. The conflict further solidified Hezbollah's role as a regional power broker.

Hezbollah's actions have not only resulted in military confrontations but have also led to human trafficking and drug production. Victims of Hezbollah's trafficking network have shared their harrowing experiences of being enslaved and exploited, highlighting the dark underbelly of the group's operations. The drug trade, particularly the production of Captagon, has devastated communities across the region, further entrenching Hezbollah's financial resources.

Backing from Iran

Despite Lebanon's economic crisis, Hezbollah continues to receive substantial funding from Iran, estimated at around $700 million (2.5 billion ILS) annually. This money is not utilized for rebuilding Lebanon's infrastructure but rather for amassing weapons and military capabilities. The prioritization of military expenditure over social welfare has led to continued suffering for the Lebanese populace.

In 2019, widespread protests erupted across Lebanon, fueled by frustration with government corruption and Hezbollah's stranglehold on the nation. The protests showcased the people's desire for change and a return to a more prosperous Lebanon. However, Hezbollah responded with force, quelling dissent and further entrenching its power.

The COVID-19 pandemic compounded Lebanon's challenges, exacerbating economic hardship and limiting the ability of citizens to organize against Hezbollah. The global crisis served as a distraction, allowing Hezbollah to solidify its control while the world turned its attention elsewhere.

On October 8, 2023, Hezbollah began to launch thousands of rockets toward northern Israeli communities following Hamas' attack in the south a day earlier. After Hezbollah's attack on Majdal Shams, a Druze community in northern Israel, which killed 12 children playing on a soccer field, Israel retaliated by eliminating many of its prominent leaders. In November 2024, a ceasefire agreement was signed by Israel, Lebanon, and five mediating countries, including the United States.

Conclusion

Hezbollah's portrayal as a resistance movement is a façade that masks its true nature as an occupying force. The group has brought misery to Lebanon and has stifled any potential for the country to regain its former glory. As the Lebanese people grapple with the consequences of Hezbollah's actions, the world must recognize the urgent need for change.

The post Hezbollah's unyielding grip on Lebanon appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

Gaza, a narrow strip of land along the Mediterranean coast, is home to over 2 million people. While its streets were once bustling with life, the ongoing conflict has left much of it in ruins. Yet, beneath this devastation lies a vast network of tunnels, more extensive than even London's underground system. These tunnels serve as a critical asset for Hamas, enabling them to smuggle weapons and orchestrate attacks against Israel. But how did these tunnels evolve from a simple lifeline for families into a sophisticated military infrastructure?

Original intentions

The origins of Gaza's tunnel network can be traced back to the late 1970s when the border between Israel and Egypt was redrawn, dividing the city of Rafah. This abrupt division separated families who had lived side by side for generations. In response, residents began to dig rudimentary tunnels to reconnect with their loved ones, allowing for clandestine visits across the border.

Initially, these tunnels were modest, simple passageways that provided a means of connection and trade. They became vital in the face of severe shortages of essential goods caused by blockades imposed by both Israel and Egypt. As smugglers recognized the potential for profit, the tunnels transformed into lucrative underground trade routes, facilitating the movement of everything from car parts to gasoline. For many Gazans, these tunnels were a lifeline, described by one Palestinian as "the lungs through which Gaza breathed."

The shift: Tunnels as military assets

However, the landscape changed dramatically during the First Intifada in 1987. As tensions escalated between Israelis and Palestinians, the tunnels became increasingly utilized for military purposes. They allowed armed groups to smuggle weapons into Gaza, turning a once-peaceful network into a pipeline for conflict. Despite efforts by Israeli authorities to dismantle the tunnels, their existence only proliferated.

By the time the Second Intifada erupted in 2000, the tunnels had evolved into a crucial component of Gaza's military strategy. Hamas and other factions used them not only for smuggling but also for launching attacks against Israeli targets. The Israeli government responded with military operations aimed at destroying these tunnels, but often at a high cost to civilian lives and infrastructure.

Hamas' expansion

In 2005, Israel withdrew from Gaza, hoping that this would ease tensions. Instead, it allowed Hamas to expand its tunnel operations without oversight. By 2007, after Hamas took control of Gaza, they redirected vast resources into building a comprehensive network of tunnels, some going over 20 stories deep. While these tunnels continued to serve practical purposes like delivering food and medicine, they also became a sophisticated military base.

Hamas invested heavily in the construction of these tunnels, with estimates suggesting that nearly 3.6 billion shekel (1 billion USD) was spent on expanding the network. This was done at the expense of the very civilians Hamas claimed to protect. Essential materials meant for rebuilding homes and schools were instead diverted underground, leading to significant humanitarian issues.

The financial backing for the tunnels raises serious questions. Much of the funding has come from international aid meant for humanitarian purposes. Hamas has been known to siphon off construction materials intended for civilian projects, using these resources to bolster their military capabilities instead. This diversion has left ordinary Gazans without basic necessities, while Hamas has built an expansive underground military infrastructure.

Israel and Egypt's ongoing efforts

Recognizing the existential threat posed by the tunnels, Israel and Egypt have continually attempted to neutralize them. In 2014, during a major military campaign, Israel destroyed over 30 tunnels, while Egypt flooded many of the tunnels along its border with seawater. Despite these efforts, the tunnel network has proven resilient, with Hamas adapting by constructing deeper and more fortified tunnels.

Israeli engineers have developed advanced detection systems, but the complexity of the tunnels remains a significant challenge. As of 2021, reports indicated that while Israel claimed to have destroyed significant portions of the tunnel network, Hamas asserted that much of it remained intact, indicating a cat-and-mouse game between the two sides.

Tunnels today

Today, Gaza's tunnel network is not just a means of smuggling; it serves as a fully operational military base. These tunnels are equipped with communication systems, storage facilities for weapons, and areas for training. Hamas can move troops and supplies underground, avoiding detection from Israeli airstrikes. The tunnels' depth and construction make it incredibly difficult for Israeli forces to target Hamas effectively.

Moreover, the tunnels provide a strategic advantage, allowing Hamas to operate in secrecy. This concealment has thwarted many of Israel's military efforts, as the tunnels can absorb the impact of airstrikes, rendering surface attacks largely ineffective.

One of the most troubling aspects of the tunnel network is how Hamas uses civilians as human shields. The tunnels are often built beneath schools, hospitals, and homes, placing non-combatants directly in the line of fire during Israeli airstrikes. This tactic has drawn international condemnation, complicating the narrative around civilian casualties in the conflict.

While the international community often criticizes Israel for its military actions, it frequently overlooks Hamas's strategy of placing its military infrastructure amidst civilian populations. This creates a dire situation where Israel is left with the morally challenging decision of whether to target Hamas' infrastructure, risking civilian lives, or to refrain and allow Hamas to operate unhindered.

The conflict in Gaza represents a new era of warfare, where traditional military tactics are challenged by the complexities of urban and subterranean environments. Israeli forces face a multifaceted threat, with Hamas using its tunnel network to launch surprise attacks and evade capture. This has prolonged the conflict and created a cycle of violence that is difficult to break.

As the war rages on, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza continues to deepen. Civilians are caught in the crossfire, facing shortages of food, water, and medical supplies. The international community watches closely, with many calling for a ceasefire, yet the underlying issues of governance, military strategy, and humanitarian needs remain unresolved.

The post Web of war: Inside Gaza's tunnels appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

Moe Berg is a name that may not ring a bell for everyone, but his life story is one of the most fascinating tales of the 20th century. A Jewish American who went from being a professional baseball player to a CIA spy, Berg defied stereotypes and expectations at every turn. This article delves into the remarkable journey of Moe Berg, exploring his childhood, baseball career, espionage activities during World War II, and life after the war.

Moe Berg travelled to Switzerland to attend a lecture by the eminent German physicist Werner Heisenberg. His mission was to determine how close the Nazis were to an operational atomic bomb, & if they were close, he was to shoot Heisenberg, then kill himself.
But after listening… pic.twitter.com/uN6k6ivsjx

— Jim Koenigsberger (@Jimfrombaseball) October 2, 2024

 Moe Berg was born in Newark, New Jersey, to immigrant parents who fled the pogroms in Ukraine. His upbringing was typical for many Jewish families in America during the early 1900s. Living in a tenement, Moe faced antisemitic bullying and even changed his last name to avoid it. However, from a young age, he displayed exceptional talents that set him apart.

By the age of three, Moe was eager to attend school, demonstrating a keen intellect and a thirst for knowledge. He excelled in sports, academics, and languages, ultimately earning a spot at Princeton University. There, he became known not just for his athletic prowess but also for his academic achievements, becoming proficient in multiple languages and even translating classical texts.

The major leagues

Berg's baseball journey began when he joined the Brooklyn Robins, transitioning through several major league teams, including the Chicago White Sox and the Boston Red Sox. Although he played alongside legends like Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig, his performance on the field was modest. Critics often joked, "He can speak ten languages but can't hit in any of them," highlighting his struggles as a player.

Despite a less-than-stellar batting average, Berg's intelligence and versatility shone through. He balanced his baseball career with education, earning a law degree from Columbia University. His dual life as an athlete and scholar made him an anomaly in the sports world.

The Japan tour

In 1934, Berg embarked on a tour of Japan with a group of American baseball players, including Babe Ruth. He brought along a portable film camera, documenting his experiences and capturing footage of Tokyo. While some speculate that the US government may have recruited him for intelligence purposes, others believe he was simply fulfilling a personal interest in filmmaking.

This footage would later play a significant role in his life, but at the time, it served as a fascinating souvenir of his travels. The tour marked a pivotal moment for Berg, as it set the stage for his eventual involvement in espionage.

The OSS

After the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941, Berg's life took a dramatic turn. He began working for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the precursor to the CIA. His linguistic skills and athletic background made him an ideal candidate for various missions, including training fellow operatives for parachute drops into enemy territory.

One of Berg's most notable missions involved overseeing the extraction of Italian rocket scientists. While it wasn't a traditional kidnapping, he successfully persuaded a high-level aeronautic engineer to come to the United States, showcasing his charm and diplomatic skills.

Berg's most thrilling assignment came when he was tasked with infiltrating the German nuclear program. The US government was deeply concerned about the potential for the Nazis to develop atomic weapons. To gather intelligence, Berg attended a lecture by Werner Heisenberg, a prominent scientist behind the German nuclear efforts.

Equipped with a self-taught understanding of nuclear physics, a pistol, and orders to eliminate Heisenberg if necessary, Berg's mission was fraught with tension. Although Heisenberg's research did not indicate that Germany was close to developing a bomb, Berg's ability to navigate complex scientific discussions proved invaluable.

Life after World War II

After the war, Berg returned to the US, where he was awarded several medals for his service. However, he famously refused the Medal of Freedom, citing embarrassment. The post-war years were challenging for Berg, as he struggled to find his place in a world that had changed dramatically.

His brother noted that Berg seemed different after the war – moody and irritable. Some speculate that this change was linked to the CIA's refusal to send him to Israel or the failure of his last mission, which left him feeling disillusioned. Despite his past achievements, Berg found it difficult to reintegrate into civilian life.

In the years following the war, Berg withdrew from public life. He lived with his siblings and spent much of his time reading and reflecting on his past. Although he occasionally traveled and maintained friendships, his days were largely spent in solitude.

Despite his fame as a baseball player and a spy, few people in his neighborhood knew of his remarkable history. Berg's last words were reportedly about baseball, indicating that his love for the game remained strong until the end.

A legacy recognized

Moe Berg passed away in 1972, and his sister accepted his long-deferred Medal of Freedom, later donating it to the Baseball Hall of Fame. While Berg may not have been the most celebrated baseball player, his unique life story as a patriot, a polymath, and a Jewish American deserves recognition. Today, Moe Berg is remembered not just for his contributions to baseball but also for his extraordinary role in espionage during one of history's most tumultuous periods.

The post From baseball to espionage: The extraordinary Moe Berg appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

The topic of Zionism often stirs up intense emotions and debates, especially regarding its historical context and implications. While some view it as a colonialist movement, others see it as a legitimate expression of a people's right to return to their ancestral homeland. This article explores the multifaceted history of Zionism, its connections to Jewish identity, and the ongoing discourse surrounding its impact on Palestinians and the broader region.

Understanding Palestinian indigeneity

When discussing Zionism, it's crucial to acknowledge the deep-rooted connection Palestinians have to the land now known as Israel or Palestine. This connection is intrinsic to their identity and history, and no one should question the legitimacy of Palestinian rights in this context. Palestinian identity has been shaped through generations, and their historical ties to the land are as significant as those of the Jewish people.

The origins of Zionism

To understand Zionism, we must look back in history. Although often seen as a modern political movement that emerged in the late 19th century, the roots of Zionism stretch back over 2000 years. Since the Roman exile around 70 CE, the Jewish connection to the land of Israel has been a central element of Jewish culture and religious practice. This longing for a return to Zion is reflected in daily prayers and religious observances, emphasizing the Jewish people's enduring bond with their ancestral homeland.

The Jewish kingdom existed for approximately 1000 years before the Roman Empire's conquest, which resulted in widespread exile and the loss of sovereignty. The Romans, in an effort to erase Jewish identity, renamed the region from Judea to Syria-Palestina, a name that would later become synonymous with the land. This renaming was part of a broader strategy to sever the historical and cultural ties between the Jewish people and their homeland.

The Jewish Diaspora

After the Roman exile, Jewish communities were scattered across the globe. Maintaining their identity in diaspora presented significant challenges, particularly as much of Judaism was tied to the land of Israel. This led to a profound cultural shift, where Jewish leaders reframed their identity and connection to the land as a divine promise. The belief was that they lost the land of Judea due to their sins, and the better Jews became as a people, the closer they would be to returning home, creating a cycle of resilience and hope amidst suffering.

The emergence of modern political Zionism

Fast forward to the late 19th century, where modern political Zionism began to take shape. Influenced by centuries of antisemitism and persecution, Theodore Herzl, an Austro-Hungarian Jewish journalist, published "Der Judenstaat," calling for a political solution to the Jewish plight through the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. This marked a pivotal moment in Jewish history, as it was the first widely circulated call for a return to their ancestral land.

The Balfour Declaration

In 1917, Herzl's vision gained international recognition through the Balfour Declaration, where the British Empire endorsed the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. This declaration was a significant turning point, as it validated the Jewish claim to the land on a global stage. The subsequent League of Nations mandate and the San Remo Conference further solidified this support, but it also heightened tensions with the Arab population already residing in the region.

For many Palestinians and Arab nations, the British support of Zionism was perceived as a form of colonialism, mirroring historical practices of imperialism where external powers seized land and suppressed local identities. This perception has fueled the narrative that Zionism is a colonial project seeking to extend European influence at the expense of the indigenous Arab population.

Despite the criticisms, it is essential to recognize that when Herzl and other Zionist leaders spoke of colonialism, they did so in the context of establishing a homeland for the Jewish people. Their narrative did not inherently exclude Palestinians from their right to exist on the land. It articulated the desire for Jews to return home after centuries of exile and persecution, particularly in light of rising antisemitism in Europe.

The conflict and its consequences

As hundreds of thousands of Jews began returning to the British Mandate of Palestine, seeking refuge from persecution, tensions escalated between Jewish and Arab populations. The backdrop of World War II and the Holocaust further intensified the urgency for a Jewish state, as Jews saw Israel as their only sanctuary in a world filled with hostility. However, this aspiration led to a complex and often violent conflict as both groups staked their claims to the land.

In response to the growing Jewish population and the support of the British Empire, many Palestinians sought assistance from surrounding Arab nations. This reliance on external support reflected their political vulnerability and the challenges they faced in asserting their rights amidst the influx of Jewish immigrants. The convergence of these aspirations created a volatile situation that would ultimately lead to conflict.

The narrative surrounding Zionism is complex and layered, intertwining Jewish historical aspirations with Palestinian rights and identity. Understanding this multifaceted history is crucial for fostering dialogue and empathy between both communities. As we reflect on the past, it becomes evident that recognizing each group's connection to the land is essential for paving the way toward a more peaceful and just future.

The post Is Zionism colonialism? appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

When we reflect on the heroes of the Holocaust, names like Oskar Schindler, the German businessman who rescued over 1,200 Jews, often come to mind. However, another remarkable figure emerged during this dark chapter in history: Abdol Hossein Sardari, an Iranian diplomat who risked everything to save Jews from Nazi persecution. His story is one of courage, deception, and unwavering moral conviction in the face of overwhelming odds.

Iranian diplomat Abdol Hossein Sardari saved thousands of French Jews during the Holocaust. In 1979, the mullahs destroyed all of his possessions. pic.twitter.com/Wnz5yxa99T

— Avi Kaner ابراهيم אבי (@AviKaner) May 5, 2024

 Sardari was not your typical hero. Born into a prominent Iranian family, he enjoyed the privileges of Persian royalty, including an education abroad and influential political connections. He began his diplomatic career in Paris in 1937, serving as a junior diplomat. As France fell to the Nazis in 1940, he was promoted to head of Consular Affairs, tasked with overseeing the well-being of Iranians in Paris.

Within this community were a couple of hundred Iranian Jews, many of whom had fled Iran during the Iranian Bolshevik Revolution or had moved to Paris seeking economic opportunities. They lived relatively well, owning homes and celebrating holidays with grand festivities, until the Nazis imposed their brutal regime.

The situation for Jews in France took a drastic turn on September 27, 1940, when the Nazis mandated that all Jews register with the police. Sardari observed the escalating harassment and discrimination against non-Aryans, realizing the gravity of the situation. Jews began losing their jobs, being barred from public life, and facing arrest. The French government required Jews to carry ID cards marked with the word "Juif" in bold red letters.

While the Nazis classified Iranians as related to the original Aryans, which offered some protection, Sardari felt a moral obligation to protect all Iranians, including Jewish ones. He could not stand idly by as his fellow citizens faced persecution.

Sardari's clever deception

To save the Iranian Jews, Sardari employed a bold and cunning strategy. He hosted lavish parties at the Iranian embassy, inviting German officials and winning their trust. This approach allowed him to build connections that would prove invaluable in his efforts to protect the Iranian Jews.

Using his legal education, Sardari crafted an elaborate deception. He wrote to the Vichy government, claiming that the Iranian Jews were not actually racially Jewish, but rather "Jugutis," a group of purebred Iranians who had adopted certain Jewish practices. He argued that they should be considered Aryan because of their blood and cultural heritage. This audacious claim was a fabrication, yet it was designed to exploit the Nazis' twisted racial logic.

Sardari's arguments gained traction within the Nazi bureaucracy, prompting further investigation into his claims. Meanwhile, he took advantage of his position to issue blank passports and visas from the embassy's vault, granting hundreds of Iranian Jews the means to escape persecution without revealing their Jewish identity.

As the war progressed and the situation worsened for Jews in France, Sardari's efforts intensified. In 1941, as British and Russian forces invaded Iran, the Iranian government recalled Sardari. Undeterred, he continued his mission, even after losing his salary and enduring hardships. He went without food and heat, yet his resolve remained unshaken. His appeals eventually reached Adolf Eichmann, the infamous SS officer responsible for organizing the Final Solution. Although Eichmann dismissed Sardari's claims as "Jewish tricks," Sardari's unwavering commitment led to a remarkable outcome.

Despite Eichmann's rejection, Sardari's efforts bore fruit. German officials began to accept his pleas, and soon, the Vichy authorities exempted the so-called Jugutis from anti-Jewish legislation. Sardari's work initially focused on Iranian Jews, but as word spread, he found himself helping French and non-Iranian Jews as well.

The aftermath and legacy

His actions saved countless lives, and he became a hero among the Iranian Jewish community in Paris. However, upon returning to Iran, he faced legal charges for his actions. He spent ten days in jail for issuing visas to non-Iranians before being released through intervention.

After the Iranian Revolution in 1979, Sardari's life took a tragic turn. The new Islamist government seized his property, stripped him of his ambassador's pension, and executed his nephew, who was the previous prime minister. Fearing for his life, Sardari fled to England, where he lived in poverty until his death in 1981.

Years later, Yad Vashem reached out to him for details about his life-saving work. In his response, Sardari humbly stated, "As you may know, I had the pleasure of being the Iranian Consul in Paris during the German occupation of France, and as such, it was my duty to save all Iranians, including Iranian Jews."

Abdol Hossein Sardari's story is a testament to the power of individual conviction and moral courage. He faced immense pressure and danger yet chose to act righteously, saving lives at great personal risk. His legacy serves as a reminder of the impact one person can have in the fight against injustice, and it challenges us to consider what we would do in similar circumstances.

The post The Iranian Muslim who saved Jews from the Holocaust appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

In the darkest days of history, amidst the horrors of Auschwitz, one young Jewish prisoner accomplished the unimaginable. Walter Rosenberg, later known as Rudolf Vrba, not only survived the Nazis' infamous death camp but also escaped with vital evidence of their atrocities. His story is one of resilience, courage, and the fierce determination to save others.

Life before Auschwitz

Walter Rosenberg was just a teenager when his life took a harrowing turn. At 17, he was living in Slovakia when the government ordered the Jewish community to prepare for deportation. Instead of complying with what he deemed a "stupid instruction," Walter stripped off his yellow star and attempted to flee to England. His goal was not just safety; he wanted to join the fight against the Nazis.

Unfortunately, his escape was short-lived. Hungarian guards captured him at the border, subjected him to brutal beatings, and sent him back to a labor camp in Slovakia. This was merely the beginning of his suffering. Walter tried to escape again, only to find himself at the Majdanek Concentration Camp, where conditions were even worse. Starvation, disease, and violence reigned supreme, with the Nazis instilling fear through gruesome displays of power.

Arrival at Auschwitz

After enduring the horrors of Majdanek, Walter found himself crammed into a cattle car heading to Auschwitz. Upon arrival, he witnessed the horrific process that separated men from women and boys from girls. Most of the newcomers were led to what they believed were showers, only to be gassed to death. Walter's job soon became grim; he was tasked with removing the bodies of those who had perished and sorting through their belongings, which revealed the victims' false hopes of relocation.

The Nazis viewed their victims not as humans but as resources to be exploited. Wedding rings, gold teeth, and even hair were repurposed to fund the war effort. Walter recognized that the key to the Nazis' operation was keeping the victims unaware of their fate. He understood that if the prisoners realized the truth, they could resist and potentially disrupt the entire system.

The seed of resistance

Determined to warn the remaining Jews of Europe, Walter began to formulate a plan. His mission became clear: he needed to escape Auschwitz and tell the world about the genocide happening within its walls. While confined in the camp's hospital due to illness, he encountered a member of the resistance who provided him with medicine and hope.

Walter secured a position as a registrar, meticulously recording the names and details of fellow prisoners. His keen observational skills allowed him to gather crucial information about the camp's operations, including the construction of a new railway line intended for transporting more Jews to their deaths. As he learned about the impending deportation of Hungarian Jews, he knew he had to act quickly.

Planning the escape

Walter and fellow inmate Alfred Wetzler began to strategize their escape. They analyzed previous attempts, learning from the mistakes of others. They determined that the outer perimeter of the camp was less guarded during the day, providing a potential opportunity for escape. On April 7, 1944, unbeknownst to them, they would begin a journey on the same Hebrew date of the ancient Israelites' flight from Egyptian slavery.

They hollowed out a space in a woodpile, hiding there for three days while the guards searched for them. Finally, the search ceased, and they emerged, weak but free from the confines of Auschwitz.

For eleven nights, Walter and Alfred traversed enemy territory, using their wits to survive. They relied on stolen food and fresh water from streams, pushing through exhaustion and fear. Upon reaching the Slovakian border, they contacted the Slovak Jewish Council, ready to share the truth about Auschwitz.

However, their reception was not what they had hoped for. The council members, unaware of the full scope of the horrors, asked naive questions that frustrated Walter. He had just escaped a hell on earth and was met with skepticism. Nevertheless, he and Alfred recounted their harrowing experiences, detailing the genocide they had witnessed.

The Vrba-Wetzler Report

In the days that followed, Walter and Alfred dictated their findings to a typist, creating what would become known as the Vrba-Wetzler Report. This 40-page document contained chilling details about the camp, including the layout, the number of victims, and the methodology of the Nazis. They estimated that 1.75 million Jews had been murdered at Auschwitz since June 1942.

Despite the urgency of their message, the Slovak Jewish Council delayed action, leading Walter to despair. His mission to save lives seemed thwarted by indecision. Nevertheless, the report was eventually disseminated, reaching influential figures in Europe and beyond.

The Vrba-Wetzler Report garnered media attention and raised alarm bells internationally. Although it provided critical insight into the atrocities at Auschwitz, the response from Jewish leaders was mixed. Many were hesitant to act, fearing panic might worsen the situation. In Hungary, the situation grew dire as deportations continued despite the warnings.

Rudolf Kasztner, a prominent figure in the Hungarian Jewish community, was given the report. He delayed the publishing of the report in order to maintain his negotiations with the Nazis to save Hungarian Jews. In the end, he only managed to save 1,600 Jews, including himself and his family. Walter's resentment toward Kastner would linger for the rest of his life as he grappled with the consequences of delayed action.

Legacy of resistance

Despite the challenges, Walter's escape and the subsequent report eventually led to significant political pressure on Hungary to halt the deportations. World powers, including the British and American governments, intervened, and by July 9, 1944, the deportations ceased. Walter's efforts had not been in vain; his courage had saved lives.

After the war, Walter, now Rudolf Vrba, rebuilt his life. He became a biochemist, married, and had two daughters. He testified at the Nuremberg Trials, ensuring that the perpetrators of the Holocaust faced justice. His memoirs and continued advocacy against Holocaust denial kept the memory of the atrocities alive, serving as a reminder of the dangers of ignorance and indifference. In a world where the lessons of history can be forgotten or denied, Walter's story remains a powerful reminder of the importance of bearing witness and taking action in the face of injustice.

The post Rudolf Vrba's incredible escape from Auschwitz appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.

The Arabian Peninsula holds a rich tapestry of history, particularly concerning the Jewish tribes that once thrived there. These communities coexisted with their polytheistic neighbors for centuries, creating a complex social fabric. However, everything changed with the arrival of the Prophet Muhammad, which led to significant upheaval and transformation for these tribes.

Today, the region known as Arabia is primarily in Saudi Arabia, which is characterized by vast desert landscapes. However, it was home to an oasis called Yathrib, now called Medina, where Jewish farmers cultivated dates alongside their non-Jewish counterparts. This oasis was not just a geographical feature; it was a vibrant community where Jewish tribes had once held considerable power.

By the 7th century, the Jewish influence in Yathrib had waned. The region was governed by various tribes, with no singular authority dominating the landscape. Loyalty to one's tribe and their allies was the unwritten law, leading to a society where blood feuds and alliances dictated social interactions. The Jewish tribes, including the Banu Qaynuqa, Banu Nadir, and Banu Qurayza, were integral to this dynamic, finding their place within a broader tribal network.

The arrival of Muhammad

About 200 miles south of Yathrib, tensions were brewing in Mecca, the holiest city in Islam. The Kaaba, a central religious site filled with idols, was the heart of Meccan religious life and economy. When Muhammad began preaching monotheism and social equality, he threatened the established order, leading to resistance from Mecca's elites.

As Muhammad's influence grew, he faced increasing opposition, culminating in a plot to assassinate him. Narrowly escaping, he and his followers fled to Yathrib, where the local tribes, weary of constant conflict, sought his help to establish peace. This marked the beginning of a new era for both Muhammad and the Jewish tribes of Yathrib.

The constitution of Medina

Upon arriving in Yathrib, Muhammad established the first written social contract, known as the Constitution of Medina or Umma Document. This agreement aimed to unify the various tribes, including the Jewish communities, under a single political entity. For the first time, tribal divisions took a back seat to a collective identity, fostering a sense of community among the inhabitants of Yathrib.

Initially, the Jewish tribes did not view Muhammad as a spiritual leader but as a political figure who could bring stability. While some Jews began to convert to Islam, many remained skeptical, holding onto their traditions and leaders. This skepticism would eventually lead to rising tensions.

The situation escalated when a Muslim man defended a Muslim woman who had been publicly humiliated by a Jewish goldsmith, leading to violence and retaliation. Historians debate the exact events leading to this conflict, with some suggesting that the Banu Qaynuqa were simply too powerful and posed a threat to Muhammad's authority. Regardless, the outcome was the same: the Banu Kuka became the target of Muhammad's military action.

The fate of the Jewish tribes

Faced with the choice of conversion or death, the Banu Qaynuqa ultimately chose exile, abandoning their belongings but preserving their lives. However, the tensions did not end there. The Banu Nadir, having not aided the Banu Qaynuqa, soon found themselves in a precarious position as well. A young member of the Banu Nadir allegedly attempted to assassinate Muhammad, leading to their expulsion from Yathrib.

With the Banu Nadir gone, only the Banu Qurayza remained. They initially supported Muhammad during conflicts with the Meccans but soon found themselves at odds with him as well. The turning point came after the Battle of the Trench, where the Banu Qurayza were accused of breaking their pact with Muhammad by not supporting him adequately.

The Banu Qurayza faced dire consequences. They were besieged by Muhammad's forces, with their leaders forced to consider extreme measures for survival. Ultimately, they chose to submit to Muhammad, hoping for mercy. However, their fate had already been sealed as Muhammad's advisor, Sa'd ibn Muadh, ordered the beheading of the men and the captivity of the women and children.

This brutal episode marked the end of the prominent Jewish tribes in Yathrib. Their disappearance from history left a significant void, and the events surrounding their fate remain a topic of intense debate among historians and scholars.

The history of the Jewish tribes in Arabia is a multifaceted narrative filled with lessons about faith, community, and power dynamics. As we reflect on this story, we are reminded of the importance of unity in the face of adversity and the enduring bonds that connect us all.

The post The Jewish tribes of Arabia vs. Muhammad appeared first on www.israelhayom.com.