Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge.
The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev.
Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts.
The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles.
In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience.
The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter.
“The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services.
Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il
In the US, negative views increased 11 percentage points between March 2022 and March 2025, Pew Research Center finds. Outside Kenya and Nigeria, no more than approximately one-third of adults in any country express confidence in Netanyahu's conduct.
The signatories warn that the planned demonstrations "against the war in Gaza" and to "stop Israel" are "irresponsible initiatives" that will lead to two disastrous outcomes. "Their smartphones and cameras, which brought back images of beheadings and children burned alive, showed that the extermination of the Jews is once again a realizable possibility," the petition states.
he suspect spent a full year planning the assault that wounded 12 people during a peaceful rally calling for the release of hostages held by Hamas, with investigators revealing he disguised himself as a gardener to get close to his targets.
Omer Shahar, the Israeli leader of the “Run for Their Lives” marches in Colorado, recalls the Molotov cocktail attack in Colorado: “It took time for police to arrive. It was deeply shocking. I saw them getting hurt while looking at me. Security needs to be tightened. But the Jewish community should not be afraid or ashamed.”
Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, has been identified as the suspect in the attack on the "Running for Their Lives" march in Colorado, aimed at raising awareness for the hostages held in Gaza. Six people were injured in the incident, two of whom were airlifted to a hospital in Denver with severe burns. The Boulder district attorney said that a decision on what charges to file will be made in the coming days.
Second antisemitic attack in the US in less than two weeks: “We were marching on Pearl Street when a man waited for us with bottles and threw them at us,” said an organizer. Colorado Attorney General: “A hate crime, considering the group that was targeted.” Israeli ambassador to the UN: “This is not a political protest, this is terrorism.”
At Belaya, home to seven Tu-160 and seven Tu-95MS bombers, Irkutsk Governor Igor Kobzev confirmed a drone strike on a military unit in Sredny village, though he remained tight-lipped on specifics.
In a unanimous decision by a three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade in New York, the court ruled that President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by invoking the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs. The court rejected the administration’s central argument and ruled that the law does not grant the president unlimited powers.