Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge. The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev. Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts. The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles. In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience. The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter. “The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services. Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il

Yoav Limor

Yoav Limor is a veteran journalist and defense analyst.

Doing the bare minimum in Syria

Aside from Israel, all parties involved in the recent events in Syria can smile to themselves in satisfaction. All of them, purportedly, stood on their principles, without paying too heavy a military or diplomatic price.

The U.S., U.K. and France attacked facilities linked to Syria's chemical weapons program, thus fulfilling their promise to retaliate for the use of forbidden unconventional weapons. Russia prevented a more severe attack. The Syrians, meanwhile, sustained a minor hit which didn't threaten their primary interest – Assad's rule.

This harmony is so stark that devoted conspiracy theorists could argue the attack and its targets were coordinated in advance. This is surely untrue, but the element of surprise was also missing and the entire endeavor was seemingly geared toward achieving the bare minimum. The scope of the attack was obvious to everyone. Syria prepared for it in advance, Russia received prior warning, and to top it off U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis hurriedly declared there would be no more airstrikes, thereby removing the noose from Assad's neck. The Syrian dictator, meanwhile, wasted no time to exploit the situation as a public relations boon.

As a result, the Western trio squandered an opportunity to reshape the rules of the game in Syria, and it's doubtful the Assad regime was even deterred from using chemical weapons in the future. Russia's regional superiority received a renewed stamp of approval, and it could respond by imposing harsher restrictions on foreign activity in Syria – with an emphasis on Israel – so as not to disturb it from reaping the fruits of economic rehabilitation. Assad, for his part, understands that the world will not stop him from retaking control of his country, still bleeding from seven years of civil war.

Consequently, the only player left wanting is Israel, which remains alone in the fight against the forces of evil amassing in the northern sector. Friday's report in the Israeli media – that the drone Iran launched into Israel on February 10 was armed with explosives – was not a coincidence. Its purpose was to illustrate how the Iranians are dragging the region toward conflagration, against everyone's interest – including Russia and Assad.

This message most likely went unnoticed amid the noise of the American-British-French operation. Even Iran remained nonplussed. Israeli officials believe Iran is preparing its response to last week's airstrike targeting a drone base it is building in northern Syria. Reports in Iran that seven Iranians were killed in the strike, which was attributed to Israel, are meant to formulate public opinion in the Islamic republic and international community, that its expected retaliation is a response to Israeli aggression.

This is opposite of the reality of course, but Israel is struggling to convince Western countries that Iran's Quds Force, commanded Qasem Soleimani, is posing a threat to regional stability or their interests. The only one who understood this was Hassan Nasrallah, of all people. Counter to a common appraisal of the situation, his comments Friday weren't a threat against Israel but, in fact, an attempt to sidestep a fight with it. He made it clear this matter is between Iran and Israel, and that he and his organization are not part of it.

This reality is relatively convenient for Israel because it confines the fight to the Syrian arena – where Israel wields aerial and intelligence gathering dominance. Assuming Russia doesn't pose any restrictions, Israel poses a clear threat to Iran – not only can it retaliate to aggression with extreme force, it has the power to completely eradicate Iran's entire military operation in Syria.

The sides could quickly find themselves in this state of affairs if Iran's response is severe and inflicts casualties, certainly if it disrupts Israel's 70th-anniversary celebrations this week. The diplomatic-security echelon has very little tolerance for Iranian activity in Syria, and it could exploit the opportunity to make moves to shape a different reality – which is exactly what the West's airstrike early Saturday failed to do.

Related Posts