Sunday Jul 13, 2025
NEWSLETTER
www.israelhayom.com
  • Home
  • News
    • Israel
    • Israel at War
    • Middle East
    • United States
  • Opinions
  • Jewish World
    • Archaeology
    • Antisemitism
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Culture
  • Magazine
    • Feature
    • Analysis
    • Explainer
  • In Memoriam
www.israelhayom.com
  • Home
  • News
    • Israel
    • Israel at War
    • Middle East
    • United States
  • Opinions
  • Jewish World
    • Archaeology
    • Antisemitism
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Culture
  • Magazine
    • Feature
    • Analysis
    • Explainer
  • In Memoriam
www.israelhayom.com
Home Analysis

Learn the lessons of 1988

When the ideological Right ruled out an opportunity to gradually promote its ideas, preferring instead to splinter into smaller parties and sit in the opposition, the Oslo Accords were only a matter of time.

by  Akiva Bigman
Published on  06-13-2019 17:17
Last modified: 06-13-2019 17:17
Learn the lessons of 1988AFP/ Sven Nackstrand

Labor party leader Shimon Peres and newly appointed Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir sign a coalition agreement between Labor and Likud on Dec. 22, 1988 | Photo: AFP/ Sven Nackstrand

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The self-inflicted collapse of the Israeli Right in the 1992 elections, a failure that led to, among other things, the disaster that was the Oslo Accords, serves as a warning to those who in the name of ideological purism, would bring down a right-wing government. In order to avoid this phenomenon in the future, we must first understand the pervasive mood on the Right and the political ideas that dominated the right-wing of the nationalist camp at that time.

The protocols of a Knesset session some 4 years earlier, when Yitzhak Shamir was sworn in as prime minister in what would be the fifth government led by the Right following almost 30 years of left-wing rule, provide a fascinating insight into the spirit of the times. In the remarks of the ideologues on the Right, one can find all the familiar complaints.

The session began with a speech by Shamir, who was presenting the new national-unity government, this time without a rotating leadership. Shamir was at the head of this government, and Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin, both of the Labor party, were to serve in the roles of foreign minister and defense minister, respectively.

In his speech, Shamir spoke of his hope for peace with the Arab states and presented Jordan as a solution to the Palestinian problem. Settlements in Judea and Samaria were to remain and be expanded, the status of Jerusalem was not up for discussion, and negotiations with the Palestine Liberation Organization were out of the question, he said.

Throughout his speech, Shamir was repeatedly interrupted by hecklers from the left.

The alternative to Shamir's vision was not just theoretical in nature. Representatives on the Left had stated their explicit commitment to entering peace talks with the PLO.

Shamir succeeded in enlisting Labor in a government that ruled out such negotiations, in an effort to present a broad and unified front to contend with international pressure on the subject.

But this did not interest the ideological hawks in the Knesset.

Yuval Neeman of the now-defunct ultra-nationalist Tehiya party opposed the very idea of a unity government. He accused the Likud of being a left-wing party in disguise, one that planned to carry out a massive withdrawal from territories in Judea and Samaria. According to Neeman, the Right would have been better off had the president tasked Peres with forming the government. Indeed just a few years later, he was to learn how wrong he was when Rabin and Peres took power.

Rafael Eitan of the now-defunct Tzomet party also opted to join the opposition. He accused the government of being ineffective because a series of reforms he "just had" to implement weren't moving as fast as he would have liked. You would not be wrong to compare his remarks with the accusations now being thrown at the current government.

Last among these ideologues was the late Moledet party founder Rehavam Zeevi, who said the government was incapable of contending with Israel's national security issues. "A broad government means a narrow state," he said, explaining why he would vote against the Shamir government.

Hindsight is one thing, but with another election set for September, what we need now is foresight. By now, it should be clear to all that the State of Israel would have been much better off had the 1990s been more like the 1980s. Yes, there was an intifada, but it was one of riots and knifings, not bombings and the rise of Hamas. True, reforms were not implemented quickly enough, but under Rabin and later Prime Minister Ehud Barak, we learned that the other side excels at effectively leading harmful revolutions. Yes, national pride sustained a blow when we bowed to American interests and canceled the IAI Lavi jet fighter program, but giving in to former U.S. President Bill Clinton and the Democrats' vision for peace could be far more destructive.

The Gaza Strip, the High Court of Justice, illegal infiltrators, the Bedouin encampment of Khan al-Ahmar and the like are important issues that need to be taken care of.  But it seems that too many on the Right are eager to replace the government, which is not handling these issues with sufficient efficiency that will deepen failures and solidify the disaster. Instead of a leadership that has not done enough to rein in the courts, we will have a government that will broaden the progressive revolution. Instead of a government that has failed to remove enough illegal migrants, we will have a government that brings in many, many more. Instead of a government that fails to act on the demolition of Khan al-Ahmar, a new government will come in that will establish 10 more just like it. This is what is at stake.

Tags: ElectionsIsraeli RightLikudNetanyahu

Related Posts

US army sends message to Iran - with quote from 'Harbu Darbu'IDF Spokesperson's Unit

What an Israeli strike on Iran might look like

by Yoav Limor

If Israel ultimately decides to strike Iran, the range of potential scenarios spans from a complete obliteration of Tehran’s nuclear...

India and Pakistan on brink of war: How the region edged toward nuclear escalationAFP

India and Pakistan on brink of war: How the region edged toward nuclear escalation

by Elchanan Shpayizer/Makor Rishon

A deadly terror attack in Kashmir has reignited one of the world’s most volatile conflicts. What triggered the latest flare-up,...

Eight tough questions about Trump's Gaza takeover planReuters

All the reasons Israel doesn't want US control over Gaza

by Nitzan David Fuchs/Makor Rishon

Trump’s plan may sound tempting, but if our greatest ally becomes our next-door neighbor, relations could sour quickly.

Menu

Analysis 

Archaeology

Blogpost

Business & Finance

Culture

Exclusive

Explainer

Environment

 

Features

Health

In Brief

Jewish World

Judea and Samaria

Lifestyle

Cyber & Internet

Sports

 

Diplomacy 

Iran & The Gulf

Gaza Strip

Politics

Shopping

Terms of use

Privacy Policy

Submissions

Contact Us

About Us

The first issue of Israel Hayom appeared on July 30, 2007. Israel Hayom was founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better, more balanced and more accurate journalism. Journalism that speaks, not shouts. Journalism of a different kind. And free of charge.

All rights reserved to Israel Hayom

Hosted by sPD.co.il

  • Home
  • News
    • Israel at War
    • Israel
    • United States
    • Middle East
    • Sports
  • Opinions
  • Jewish World
    • Archaeology
    • Antisemitism
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Culture
  • Magazine
    • Feature
    • Analysis
    • Explainer
    • Environment & Wildlife
    • Health & Wellness
  • In Memoriam
  • Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Submit your opinion
  • Terms and conditions

All rights reserved to Israel Hayom

Hosted by sPD.co.il

Newsletter

[contact-form-7 id=”508379″ html_id=”isrh_form_Newsletter_en” title=”newsletter_subscribe”]

  • Home
  • News
    • Israel at War
    • Israel
    • United States
    • Middle East
    • Sports
  • Opinions
  • Jewish World
    • Archaeology
    • Antisemitism
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion
    • Culture
  • Magazine
    • Feature
    • Analysis
    • Explainer
    • Environment & Wildlife
    • Health & Wellness
  • In Memoriam
  • Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Submit your opinion
  • Terms and conditions

All rights reserved to Israel Hayom

Hosted by sPD.co.il