Analysis

As the war continues, we must assume that enemies across all fronts will continue to challenge us.

A year after Oct. 7, most of the public is still convinced of the war's righteousness and gives decision-makers generous credit for action.

The failure of Iran's missile offensive grants Israel the latitude to coolly consider its next move. Unlike Iran, Israel typically opts for swift action, aiming to maintain a clear link between cause and effect. The potential targets are diverse: Israel could adhere to a tit-for-tat strategy (as it did in April), retaliating solely against military objectives – bases, factories, and weapons caches.

The new year provides an opportunity for the entire region. The Iranian people, who have not forgotten the hijab protests, may attempt to reignite demonstrations if they believe Western nations will support their efforts this time.

Israel’s decision will likely depend on three factors: the level of damage inflicted on Hezbollah, the toll on Israeli soldiers' lives, and the potential for a prolonged engagement in Lebanon.

A significant blow to Hezbollah at this juncture could unravel Tehran's carefully constructed regional strategy, forcing a reevaluation of its geopolitical calculus.

Lebanon-based terror group boasts an extensive weapons cache, yet faces significant challenges against the IDF.

As their spokespersons threaten "new surprises" for Israel in the coming days, the Houthis have been diligently coordinating their operations with two pro-Iranian militias in Iraq.

"Anyone connected to the defendants, whether through business-financial ties or otherwise, is now at risk of criminal prosecution on terrorism charges," Eitan Arusy says.

Israel's ability to neutralize threats both defensively and offensively, near and far, is forcing our neighbors to reconsider their strategies – it's time to craft a new security doctrine.