United Arab Emirates Foreign Minister Anwar Gargash was quoted by the English-language Abu Dhabi newspaper The National, last Thursday as saying, "Many, many years ago, when there was an Arab decision not to have contact with Israel, that was a very, very wrong decision looking back." He predicted increased contacts between Israel and Arab states and a "strategic shift" in ties he said should focus on "progress on the peace front" between Israel and the Palestinians.
There is no doubt Gargash's remarks were made with the encouragement and guidance of Abu Dhabi crown prince Mohamed bin Zayed bin Sultan Al-Nahyan. In Arab states, it is not customary to make statements in support of Israel without the knowledge and approval of those in command.
This is not the first time senior Arab Gulf state officials have expressed support for Israel. Bahrain's foreign minister has been known to take to Twitter to issue pro-Israel and anti-Iran statements. Last fall, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was given the royal treatment when he visited Oman together with the head of the Mossad, Yossi Cohen. In recent months, dozens of Israeli athletes have competed in sporting events in Qatar and Abu Dhabi, and Israel's national anthem was played numerous times in Doha, the Qatari capital. Likud party members and government ministers Yisrael Katz, Ayoub Kara and Miri Regev have also visited the Gulf.
What has changed in the Gulf? How has support for the Palestinians been replaced by support for Israel? It appears the people of the Gulf have adopted a new stance, having opened their eyes to the illusion of opposition to and war against Israel. They understood that their support for the Palestinians is detrimental to them, including from a financial perspective. The fact that the Palestinians have grown closer to Iran has sparked ire in many Gulf states, which see the ayatollah regime as an enemy and the Palestinians' increasingly closer ties with Tehran as betrayal.
No matter the reason, Israel's warming ties with the Gulf are a significant achievement that can be attributed to Netanyahu. The Gulf Arab states are interested in being part of the Western world, not necessarily out of a love of Zion, but because they understand that the path to warmer ties with the West and the U.S. runs through Israel. In the Gulf, they recall how America liberated Kuwait from Iraqi occupation in the early 1990s, and they are interested in maintaining these ties. It is not for nothing that there are over 10 American and British military bases operating in six Gulf states – Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and the UAE.
A majority of Gulf leaders decided to align with U.S President Donald Trump's policy on Iran, as well as on his stance on the Palestinian issue, albeit not publicly. Ties with Israel are aimed at deterring the Iranians and providing a means of entry to the United States. As is the case with other Arab states, genuine peace is not the object of the Gulf states aspirations but rather the outcome of interests and the need to maintain security and stability and maintain U.S. aid. The Arab street is interested in nothing more than an "agreement" and certainly not warm relations. Only those unfamiliar with the mentality of the region could be surprised when a Jordanian parliamentarian speaks out against Israel or when Egypt votes against Israel at the U.N.
Gargash's pro-Israel remark, then, constitutes a challenge to Israeli diplomacy. Is this a change for the better? Will the relationship float freely to the surface? One must hope that this is the beginning of a new era in relations with Gulf states, one of open and overt ties.
