Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge.
The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev.
Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts.
The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles.
In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience.
The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter.
“The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services.
Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il
The reopening is taking place under restrictions that did not exist before the war, operating without the transfer of goods and subject to additional security oversight under Israeli supervision. It is a concession that is far from ideal, but the lesser evil under current circumstances
The Iranian issue is not only about nuclear capabilities or missiles, but about declarations and credibility. As long as statements by all sides are not backed by clear action, the gap will continue to widen. In the Middle East, such gaps tend to close not through diplomacy, but through crises.
President Donald Trump has left the door open to talks with Iran, but all indications suggest the sides are edging closer to confrontation. One scenario could even lead Israel to join a US strike.
Those who entered the stormy sea and were privileged to see it split marked out the historic path that continues from then until our own day. Slaves who feared their masters were required to shed the husks of mental enslavement. Their children, who crossed the sea, would become the generation that conquered Canaan in the end. And from them, to our own generations.
Public protests in Iran have been crushed and its society has been battered, but the cracks at the top of the regime are growing. Senior commanders are amassing wealth in the West, their children hold foreign citizenship, and a scenario of an internal plot, backed by Western powers, could make a large-scale war unnecessary.
The Exodus from Egypt was first and foremost a revolution of consciousness, the emergence of a nation of slaves into freedom. The process by which the Hebrew fetus was torn from the Egyptian womb minted our national identity in the coinage of eternity.
As US forces reinforce the region and President Trump escalates deterrent messaging, regime-linked discourse in Tehran has increasingly focused on potential response scenarios. Senior figures have openly threatened a preemptive strike. Iran’s available options center primarily on its missile and drone capabilities, but also include asymmetric measures such as targeted assassinations in Israel and the activation of sleeper cell operatives inside the United States.
The draft exemption law is important because it lowers the level of hostility, halts the reflexive “anti” discourse, and creates space in which the Haredi public understands that it must change. Not change forced by a clenched fist, but change that can actually be implemented.
The critical mistake of the Trump-Kushner approach is the attempt to reduce a deep national, religious, and identity conflict to a cash-flow and urban-development problem.
The international community has no clue what the true gravity of the Holocaust was, nor do they care unless they can use it for their own political agenda.