Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge. The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev. Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts. The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles. In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience. The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter. “The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services. Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il

Eytan Gilboa

Professor Eytan Gilboa is an expert on US-Israel relations, international communication, and public diplomacy. He is also a senior researcher at The Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS).

Defeats on non-military fronts

Why does Israel not file complaints with the UN Security Council against Lebanon and Yemen for aggression and war crimes whenever Hezbollah attacks from the north and the Houthis from the south?

 

Despite military achievements in Gaza, Israel faces defeats on other fronts: public relations, diplomacy, and legal battles. These are part of public diplomacy, which is as crucial as military strategy.

The failure lies in framing the war. Framing events is critical in the battle for media and public opinion, and whoever sets the narrative first gains a significant advantage.

Since October 7, Israel is not only fighting in Gaza. The war is against Iran and all its proxies in the region, including Hamas, Hezbollah, militias in Syria and Iraq, and the Houthis in Yemen. Iran also directly attacked Israel on the night of April 13-14.

Why, in response to South Africa's unfounded complaint to the International Court of Justice in The Hague against Israel for alleged "genocide" intentions in Gaza, which are baseless, does Israel not file a justified complaint against Iran for its intentions and plans to destroy Israel?

The Palestinians have enormous achievements in the field of public relations because they appear weak compared to Israel and because of the destruction in Gaza. But framing the war against Iran and its proxies would change the picture, as Iranian power is equal to or greater than Israel's. Iran's civilian and military leaders have repeatedly declared their intention to destroy Israel, and the circle of fire they have created around it is aimed at achieving this goal.

Hamas' attack on October 7 was intended to ignite the Iranian circle of fire, or at least to test the waters for a more decisive move in the future.

Even the term "the war against Hamas in Gaza" is misleading. Few people in the world know who Hamas is and are familiar with its charter and platform, which call for the destruction of Israel. Few know about its conduct in Gaza since it took over. The war is presented in the media as aggression against Gaza's civilians, not against Hamas fighters and the military infrastructure they built above and below ground.

When the skilled IDF spokesperson provides evidence against Hamas, it is often too late.

Therefore, from the outset, the war should have been defined as one against Iran and its proxies, not against the Palestinians or Hamas in Gaza.

Hezbollah claims it attacks only military targets in Israel. This is a lie. Anti-tank missile fire directly at houses along the entire northern border is not aimed at military targets. The Houthis have fired several times at Eilat and recently hit Tel Aviv. Hezbollah and the Houthis are committing serious war crimes. Israel's counterattacks in Gaza and on all other fronts are justified as basic self-defense.

The propaganda war against Israel is waged in international UN bodies, and it must be addressed primarily there. It is unclear why Israel does not file complaints with the Security Council against Lebanon and Yemen for aggression and war crimes whenever Hezbollah attacks from the north and the Houthis from the south, demanding condemnation and action against them. Why, in response to South Africa's unfounded complaint to the International Court of Justice in The Hague against Israel for alleged "genocide" intentions in Gaza, does Israel not file a justified complaint against Iran for its intentions and plans to destroy Israel?

The UN and its institutions are indeed heavily biased against Israel and infected with covert or overt anti-Semitism. Therefore, Israel tends to ignore them. But many countries, including those in the liberal West, regard them with respect and seriousness. When Israel is accused of war crimes in UN institutions and only tries to defend itself, the result is predictable, and ultimately, only Israel is found guilty.

Effective public diplomacy uses all available tools and, like any war, must combine defense with offense. It is time to launch a multi-front public relations, diplomatic, and legal offensive against Iran and its proxies. If UN institutions seriously consider Israel's complaints and act accordingly, Israel will benefit. If not, they can be condemned as biased and one-sided, making it harder for the West to accept their decisions against Israel.

Related Posts