US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's recent visit to Israel's Psagot winery, his condemnation of boycott, divestment and sanctions movement as anti-Semitic, and recognition of products produced in Jewish communities East of 1967 lines as made in Israel" were not "Trump's gifts" to Israel as The New York Times reported on Nov. 21. Nor was Pompeo acting as "An extremist leader of the Yesha Council of Settlements instead of the foreign minister of the superpower" as Haaretz wrote in its Nov. 20 editorial. Rather, Pompeo's recognition of Jewish communities in Area C of Judea and Samaria and his condemnation of anti-Semitic product labeling and BDS warfare were the US administration's affirmations of human rights, in this case, Jewish human rights. They were also expressions of much needed moral clarity. Regrettably, political propagandists and various epistemological authorities in Israel and abroad have for years politicized Israel's fundamental legal and historical rights in service of political positions that have today undermined and delegitimized Israel's right to exist as the democratic nation state of the Jewish people.
Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter
This intensifying and increasingly mainstreamed "cancel culture" that has targeted Israel for moral and ideological annihilation has negated Jewish collective liberty and sovereignty that were uniquely affirmed twice last century, by both the League of Nations and its successor, the United Nations via its founding charter. That formal international legal recognition of Jewish historical rights that formally noted, "close settlement of the land" West of the Jordan River would anchor Israel's Declaration of Independence. The regrettable reflexive response by some journalists at home and many more abroad to the US administration's unprecedented recognition of Israel's legal presence over the 1949 armistice lines overlooks, ignores, and frequently defies these internationally sanctioned Jewish historical, legal and collective human rights. In so doing, misinformed and misguided denunciations of Secretary Pompeo's embrace of Israel misrepresent at best and disfigure at worst the historical record. These errors also falsify the complex reality of the current legal and diplomatic status of Israel and its Palestinian neighbors.
Pompeo's visit to Psagot was also reflected the agreed legal and diplomatic framework of the 1995 Oslo Interim Accords that were internationally witnessed and guaranteed by the United States , Russia, Egypt, Jordan, Norway, and the European Union. The accords affirmed in no uncertain terms that Israeli and Palestinian Authority construction and building rights in areas under their respective jurisdictions would continue until the final status negotiated disposition of the territories. That was the legal and diplomatic backdrop for Pompeo's declaration of a US policy of "reality-based diplomacy". It is regrettable that some uninformed and other willfully blind journalists commentators took the liberty of recasting Psagot and other Jewish communities east of the 1949 armistice lines as "illegal". And in the tradition of Orwellian doublespeak, these same media experts have legitimized as "freedom of political protest and speech", BDS cancellation warfare and its support for Nazi-era labeling of Jewish products. Its worth remembering that in May 2019, the German parliament decried both BDS and product labeling as central to Germany's legal determination of BDS as anti-Semitic.
Instead, Pompeo's visit and his statements were correctives to these errors of judgment in reporting and commentary. Facts still matter. Pompeo's visit reminds the international community of a truth that every Israeli government since 1967 has attempted to convey to the world, albeit unsuccessfully. Simply put: Psagot and Petach Tikvah share the same legitimacy. The secretary's visit marks the first time that a United States administration has formally recognized this equality of Jewish sovereignty.
This US recognition of collective Jewish human rights parallels the principle of secure Jewish collective life that every Israeli government has recognized since the Jewish people's reestablishment of sovereignty in 1948. The International community had formally recognized those same rights to Jewish sovereignty in 1920 at the international San Remo Conference. The principal powers of the League of Nations formalized San Remo's declarative recognition in 1922 of the Right of the Jewish People to "reconstitute their National Home In Palestine". The League of Nations further called for "close (Jewish) settlement" establishing and unanimously approving the Mandate for Palestine, that anchored the Jewish collective human right to collective freedom and sovereignty and ultimately led to Israel's Declaration of Independence and policy of every Israeli government Since 1967, sanctioning rights to Jewish community building on both sides of the 1949 armistice lines on state land.
The United States' top diplomat apparently did his legal and diplomatic homework. Apparently, he and his advisers studied the abovementioned international legal documents. His visit to Israel's Psagot winery and his accompany condemnations of BDS and anti-Semitic product labeling, reminiscent of the World War II-era, break the "glass ceiling" regarding formal US recognition of Israel's legal rights to sovereignty. US and Israel's alignment on Israel's rights to sovereignty safeguards the most fundamental Jewish collective human right today. Unfortunately, the cynical discrediting of Secretary Pompeo's alignment with the policy of all Israeli governments since 1967 reflects the lack of understanding of its critics rather than the well-reasoned positions of the current US State Department.
Subscribe to Israel Hayom's daily newsletter and never miss our top stories!
