Gilad Erdan

Gilad Erdan has served as Israel's ambassador to the US and the UN, as a minister, and as a Knesset member. He currently heads the Misgav Institute for National Security & Zionist Strategy.

The UN must rethink its route

One would think that the UN, as an institution that has championed peace and security, would join the struggle against the biggest terrorist regime in the world.

In my capacity as a minister in various Israeli cabinets, I dealt extensively with the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement. I have come to know first hand the bias and decades-long anti-Israel sentiment in the United Nations.

Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter

But despite this, I decided to begin my UN ambassadorship with a clear determination to fight for Israel's reputation and to get rid of the hatred toward Israel there and to make sure that the automatic majority against it is no longer a pre-ordained fate. I believe that now, with Arab countries embracing peace with Israel as a boon and the Iranian brutality exposed on a daily basis, there is a fighting chance of achieving this goal.

As soon as I arrived in New York, I began working alongside our friends in the Trump administration to restore the UN sanctions on Iran that had been lifted following the 2015 nuclear deal. The windfall profits Tehran got from the relief in its wake has armed its terrorist tentacles in Iran, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Gaza, and of course in Lebanon.

One would think that the UN, as an institution that has championed peace and security, would join the struggle against the biggest terrorist regime in the world, which has continued to openly call for the annihilation of Israel. Unfortunately, the Security Council has chosen excuses over actions.

While Iran executes protesters, including wrestler Navid Afkari, a majority of Security Council members have shamefully refused to join the US-led effort against Tehran, effectively choosing to reward such murderous action. There is no better proof for the disconnect between the theoretical ideas of the UN Charter and its failed implementation in reality.

UN members must "practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbors," the charter stipulates. But despite this, the UN and its institutions have remained silent when three countries have announced new peace deals (Israel, the UAE and Bahrain).

In his address at the start of the General Debate last week, Secretary-General Antรณnio Guterres chose to speak about Afghanistan and other matters while completely ignoring the normalization deals that have changed the Middle East, while also focusing on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Thus, the UN has become once again a body of slogans that are detached from reality, as part of the years-long anti-Israel show there.

When it funds agencies like UNRWA that only perpetuate the culture of lies and avoids dealing with the pressing matters critical to world peace, the UN risks losing the last vestiges of legitimacy and relevancy. If the UN fails to confront the worst form of regimes and continues to obsessively preoccupy itself with the Palestinian issue, in 75 years it will no longer be able to celebrate its anniversary, because it will have lost its right to exist.

Subscribe to Israel Hayom's daily newsletter and never miss our top stories!

The prestigious and bloated organization that was created in the wake of the Holocaust and World War II must rethink its route. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will address the General Assembly on Tuesday and showcase Israel's many accomplishments and importance on the global stage, and it is high noon for the UN to underscore Israel's global role as well. I will fight for this with every fiber of my being and I believe that if the UN wants to be relevant, it must show impartiality and fairness toward Israel.

 

Related Posts