Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge. The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev. Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts. The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles. In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience. The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter. “The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services. Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il

Prof. Eyal Zisser

Eyal Zisser is a lecturer in the Middle East History Department at Tel Aviv University.

Biden's visit – behind the smiles

It could still emerge that Biden not only failed to advance a regional defense alliance against Iran but brought Russia and Tehran closer together; a blunder for which Israel might have to pay in the form of reduced freedom of action in Syria.

American presidents usually aren't very popular in the Middle East. Although every Arab, Iranian, and Turk dreams of one day immigrating to the United States and making a life there, until that day comes, if ever, they will wholeheartedly hate the West and especially the US, which more than anything symbolizes the West's victory and diplomatic, economic, and even technological superiority over the East.

Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Indeed, more than a few presidents have raised the ire and animosity of the region's people and rulers but, as they say: Even if they don't like one president or another, at least they are afraid of him and respect him.

Thus, presidents such as George H.W. Bush and Donald Trump eschewed attempts to gain favor and popularity, which were largely futile from the start, and instead worked steadily and aggressively to advance American interests in the region. Under George W. Bush, the US conquered Afghanistan and Iraq, while Trump made the decision to confront Iran, ordered the assassination of Qassem Soleimani, the Quds Force commander at the time, and withdrew from the nuclear deal with the ayatollah regime.

Lo and behold, these presidents were respected and feared, and there was little to no appetite for getting on their wrong side. After all, when you speak to the people of the region in their language, the language of force and power, they understand the message from Washington far better than pandering, appeasement, and a misguided desire to exhibit understanding and tolerance for the evil acts and extremist policies of countries such as Iran or Bashar Assad's Syria.

Joe Biden, who visited the region for the first time as president last week, is not a Bush, Trump, or even Barack Obama, who, as we recall, tried riding the wave of the Arab Spring to encourage the younger generation to seek change but ultimately found himself mired in chaos and a swelling tide of Islamist extremism.

Biden came here weak and domestically challenged, who needs the goodwill of the region's rulers – namely from Saudi Arabia – more than they need him. To be sure, Biden's primary goal was to enlist Saudi support for stabilizing global oil markets before it costs him a trouncing in the midterm elections this November and of course the presidency in two years.

During his visit, Biden said all the right things, but what's more important is what he didn't say. First and foremost, that he doesn't really care about the Middle East and that unlike Eastern Europe, where he is eager to confront the Russians, or the Far East, where he is preparing for a conflict with China, over here he wants to cut a deal with Iran that will allow him to disengage from the Middle East and its assortment of problems.

Second, that he is committed to defending his allies, the rulers of the moderate Arab countries. The Americans, to be sure, have built a reputation for lacking credibility and loyalty to their friends and allies.

Such was the case with the Shah in Iran, Hosni Mubarak and then Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi in Egypt, and today, again, with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, who Biden has shunned and even treated with hostility since entering the White House – over the assassination of Saudi journalist Khashoggi.

All of this is obvious and plain to see, and therefore it's no surprise that the Saudi press was apathetic about his visit and instead chose to highlight his weakness and the lack of faith in Washington's steps. After all, no one is truly pinning any hopes on American commitments and resolve when it comes to fighting Iran, and not just on the nuclear front but over its support for terror, subversive activities, and spreading military presence across the region.

The person who capitalized on Biden's visit to the region was Russian President Vladimir Putin, who will visit Iran this week. No one particularly likes Putin either, not even Iran, but Putin is respected and Putin is feared.

Hence, it could still emerge that Biden not only failed to advance a regional defense alliance against Iran but brought Russia and Tehran closer together – a blunder for which Israel might have to pay in the form of reduced freedom of action in Syria.

Subscribe to Israel Hayom's daily newsletter and never miss our top stories!

Related Posts