Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge. The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev. Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts. The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles. In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience. The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter. “The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services. Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il

Dr. Joseph Frager

Dr. Joseph Frager is the first vice president of the National Council of Young Israel.

Iran's time is up

We are at an all-or-nothing military response stage. Anything short of total eradication of Iran's nuclear facilities will not stop the mullahs' quest for nuclear weapons.

US President Donald Trump's last-minute decision to pull back from a retaliatory strike on Iran is nothing new in the annals of modern history.

According to former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, Benjamin Netanyahu was on the verge of attacking Iran three times between 2010 and 2012 but was blocked each time by other cabinet ministers or by the IDF chief of staff.

These attacks were planned for the most part before the Barack Obama administration came into power; that administration put an end to Israel's plans to attack Iran. This may have been one of President Obama's most colossal mistakes.

Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter

On March 28, 2012, then-Defense Minister Barak publicly praised himself and then-US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, saying, "The decision [to cancel the attack] was the result of contacts between the [Israeli] Defense Ministry and the Pentagon."

During the Obama years, Israel was prevented from attacking Iran's nuclear facilities. There were even reports that "friends of Obama" (namely Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's national security adviser) threatened Israel's jets would be shot out of the sky if it tried to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities.

Although regime change and/or a vastly improved agreement with Iran on its nuclear program are the best options, neither appears to be realistic.

The limited US strike against Iranian radar and missile installations that Trump called off would have sent a strong message, but one that unfortunately would have only fed into the Iranian narrative that America is the aggressor. They would not have forced the mullahs back to the negotiating table.

There is no question the Trump administration is giving the ayatollahs daily fits. They have been completely unnerved by Trump and National Security Adviser John Bolton. However, the mullahs are probably too smart for their own good. Their clear and calculated decision to shoot down a $120 million American unmanned aerial vehicle was designed to force America to retaliate. This would have played well for their audience the Iranian people, and their allies in the region.

Essentially, the president has only two real military options: Either he strikes all of the Iranian nuclear facilities in one major, thorough attack, or he does not strike at all. Anything short of a massive attack will be read the wrong way.

This is not to say that all diplomatic avenues shouldn't be pursued, just that we are at an all-or-nothing military response stage. Anything short of total eradication of every nuclear facility in Iran will not stop the mullahs in their quest for nuclear weapons.

I have always believed in diplomacy first. The Obama agreement was not even a temporary solution for a very dangerous situation. America is running out of options and Iran is running out of time.

Reprinted with permission from JNS.org.

Related Posts