Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge. The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev. Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts. The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles. In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience. The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter. “The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services. Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il

Ariel Kahana

Ariel Kahana is Israel Hayom's senior diplomatic and White House correspondent.

More irresponsible separatism by the Right

Despite statements about having learned their lesson, leaders of the unsuccessful right-wing parties are going to do the same thing this election, putting both their camp and the nation at risk.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over but expecting different results, Albert Einstein once said. It would appear that some of the people who see themselves as leaders of the Right are determined to prove Einstein right – New Right leader Naftali Bennett and Zehut leader Moshe Feiglin, in particular, who also like to quote the same line from the great scientist.

Both Feiglin and Bennett took sound beatings in the April election, struck fatal blows to the people and values they pretend to represent, and to a certain extent are indirectly responsible for Avigdor Lieberman's insane move. Still, they are back and running in the September election.

Despite racking up proven failures, Bennett and Feiglin for some reason expect different results this time. They are telling us they've changed, learned their lesson, and will run with the other and a bunch of other baseless stories. Why "stories"? Because even if the two of them were to run on a joint ticket, they might not make it past the minimum electoral threshold. Feiglin's voters loathe Bennett, and Bennett's voters detest Feiglin. Their respective failures in April are offputting to many of the people who voted for them. So even if polls deem such a strange alliance viable, the polls could be wrong.

Throughout the last campaign, both Bennett and Feiglin were well aware that they were hovering near the minimum threshold, but with skill that approached irresponsibility hid that fact from the public and, despite warnings about the possible ramifications, stayed in the race to the very end, leading to a loss of at least six seats for the national camp. It was a dangerous gamble and repeating it is nothing less than a dereliction of duty. The same goes for any other party that aims to run on its own, such as the far-right Otzma Yehudit, which will certainly fail to make it over the minimum threshold and into the Knesset. Votes that are more precious than gold must not be put at risk this way.

Therefore, Bennett, Feiglin, Otzma Yehudit leader Itamar Ben-Gvir, and Ayelet Shaked – who played a significant role in the downfall of the New Right – have two possibilities: to run on the list of another party that did well in the April election, or wait out this round. Any other gambit is illegitimate and poses a danger to the country. Nothing less.

The Likud needs an ideological party to keep it in line, but there is no room for more than one party to the Right of the Likud. The far-right-wing parties who represent voters, both religious and secular, who hate the Likud have not successfully made it over the minimum threshold in decades. This is what happened when the Tehiya party crashed in 1992, which put the government that passed the Oslo Accords in power, and it's what happened in April with the New Right and Zehut, making it impossible to form a stable right-wing coalition.

People can throw around lofty theories of liberty ad infinitum, but when it comes down to it, it's the polls that decide and election, not ideas.

So if Bennett, Feiglin, Shaked, Ben-Gvir, or any other public figure on the Right feel that they have to run in September, they could have enough respect to join an existing party. They could join the Likud, in places too low to put them into the Knesset this time around – or be satisfied with a right-wing union. Yes, Bennett and Shaked's old home must demonstrate responsibility and allow them back, despite the anger over their abandonment last year. These are the options, and there are none others – lest the entire camp be put at risk, and as a result – the nation.

Related Posts

The new "witch hunt"

A crisis of confidence is taking hold throughout Israel. More seriously, mistrust is also growing between the head of government,...