Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge. The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev. Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts. The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles. In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience. The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter. “The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services. Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il

Yehuda Shlezinger

Yehuda Shlezinger is Israel Hayom's political correspondent.

Reason has prevailed

People are saying that the latest coalition crisis was a trick that got out of hand, a case of people backing themselves into a corner.

That could be accurate but it doesn't contradict the fact that an end to a crisis like this is an excellent time to draw political conclusions and forge a way onward. The haredi MKs might have the most work to do when it comes to that.

The haredi MKs were the last ones who needed to worry about an early election, having gotten what they wanted with a few hot-button issues: supermarkets operating on Shabbat, railway infrastructure work on Shabbat, and the budget.

If an early election had been called without a new bill regulating the conscription of yeshiva students, it would have been easy for them to bring out their voters. Still, they were worried at the idea of an early election and made wide-reaching concessions on the conscription bill, which is a subject dear to their hearts. How did that happen? They need to think about that.

The haredi parties should devote the next year and a half to thinking about and taking steps to neutralize the political dangers that are going to pop up in the next few years.

The first and foremost of those dangers is the Shas party, which was shaken to find that polls showed it barely scraping past the minimum electoral threshold. According to one Israel Hayom poll, the party wouldn't even make it into the Knesset.

Shas doesn't believe in polls, but is that enough? Maybe it's time for the party to shake things up, to think differently, to send out new messages and appeal to new audiences so the party doesn't find itself shut out in the next general election.

The United Torah Judaism people, for their part, can spend some time considering partnerships beyond the right wing. Is it right for them to remain dependent on the kindness of the Right and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu? How long will that last? Can anything be done with less "natural" partnerships?

The one bright spot for the haredim in this crisis is the victory of reason – that the haredi MKs refused to beat their heads against a brick wall and held firm in the face of criticism from their own camp. The broad concessions on the conscription bill are hard for them to swallow, but if in the past claims were made that the haredi MKs had caved to the haredi media (on issues such as the compromise on mixed-gender prayer at the Western Wall), this time, they held their ground.

It's possible they didn't have a choice, and it's also possible that they deserve credit for letting reason and common sense prevail.

Related Posts