Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge. The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev. Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts. The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles. In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience. The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter. “The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services. Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il

The Israeli Left is scared of democracy

Like any good Bolshevik, it doesn't want to hear what the public has to say, it wants to tell the public what to do.

In November 2018, it was revealed that Labor leader Avi Gabbay's campaign headquarters was behind fake Facebook accounts, supposedly unaffiliated with the party, that disseminated aggressive propaganda against Yesh Atid Chairman Yair Lapid. Gabbay initially claimed that he had nothing to do with the online slander, but eventually, he confessed his party's culpability. There was no outcry within the leftist camp, the media turned a blind eye to the entire matter, and Lapid didn't file a complaint with the police.

Yet, lo and behold, we were hit over the head with headlines about "research" pointing to a comprehensive "conspiracy" aimed at swaying public opinion via online "bots." The amateur nature of this journalism was quickly exposed, yet despite the proof that some of these alleged "bots" were, in fact, actual people, their accounts were closed without any discernible justification. A direct line links the bot report and banning right-wing Twitter users, the efforts to erase right-wing voices on Facebook, the so-called Israel Hayom bill, and the cries of incitement every time legitimate criticism is voiced against the High Court of Justice. It's always the same attempt by the Left to prevent a pluralistic debate through the silencing and demonization of others.

In the past, it was easy to silence people. Right-wing media outlets were few and far between and vulnerable, and the court even helped the Left shut them down. For example, Channel 7 was shuttered by the High Court. It was never a problem, therefore, to create a false impression of consensus, which was the case for instance during the Gaza disengagement.

Today, however, as social media platforms have risen to prominence and information bubbles to the surface, McCarthyism is more difficult and complex to execute. The effervescent nature of Israeli democracy is a nuisance to those who until recently monopolized public opinion. In the past, the media elites were able to suffocate pluralism of thought and deflect criticism from the desired views. Today they must cope with other opinions. Consequently, traditional hegemonic forces sense that they are losing their grip on public opinion and that the "wrong" people who think "wrongly" are gaining a hold.

So how do they proceed? They transition from attempts to silence entire entities (the Israel Hayom bill) to silencing private individuals; behold the age of micro-McCarthyism. We are thus witnessing more individual initiatives to silence voices (reporting others on Facebook) or more institutionalized initiatives, such as the disgraceful bot report. Instead of contending with the arguments, they stigmatize an entire camp, which is presented as a herd of absent-minded "bots," in an attempt to emphasize who controls the public discourse and who is allowed to direct it.

The bots report is a direct continuation of the efforts to deny the Right any significant inroads into the media and other systems that shape opinion, in the fear that the wrong ideas will resonate. The bottom line is that the Israeli Left isn't really afraid of fake online profiles, or "bots" for that matter. It is afraid of democracy. Like any good Bolshevik, it doesn't want to hear what the public has to say, it wants to tell the public what to do.

Related Posts