Time after time the Israeli public, and the courts as well, are forced to discuss the pearls of wisdom coming from the mouths of members of the Joint Arab List, especially those of the Balad faction. Time and again we hear evasive and stuttered explanations, according to which the comments that were said or written were simply misunderstood or taken out of context, and that the persons involved are against the use of any type of violence.
These explanations were put on trial more than once, and in many cases were even lent a listening ear by the judges, who observe them through a narrow judicial prism, rule what they rule, and go on to the next case.
Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter
But it must be understood that these are not just slips of the tongue or fumbles, but a sequence of expressions that assert a dedication to the Palestinian narrative. We hear reverberations to this narrative, incidentally, time and again from senor Palestinian Authority officials, above all PA President Mahmoud Abbas. After all, Abbas also tends to stutter or disappear every time he is required to condemn acts of terror or explain why the PA calls killed terrorists "shahids" (martyrs), glorifies them and continues to pay their families a salary.
What indeed is this Palestinian narrative that these members of the Joint List adhere to, at times with adjustments for the Israeli ear? Allow me to recite some of its major points.
First: "The Jews are not a people, only a faith, and therefore do not have the right to self-determination and to their own homeland." This may explain the adamant denial to recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people.
Second: "The Land of Israel belongs to Palestinians, those Arabs who lived there before the Jews returned to their land." These Arabs, who eventually adopted a Palestinian identity, are therefore the owners of that land, and those who left it in 1948 have the right to return to their lands.
Third: "The Israeli presence in the Land of Israel, especially in Judea and Samaria, is an occupation." The occupation can and must be opposed in every manner, not only using violence against soldiers but also against civilians, who are nothing more than "colonialist" settlers who came to settle Palestinian lands.
Constraints on the PA have led Abbas to conclude that from a tactical perspective, the use of terror is not useful and even detrimental. But this is not a completely moral denial of violence, and we will never catch Abbas condemning acts of terror against Israeli soldiers in Judea and Samaria, seeing as how the Palestinian public and Abbas in his heart of hearts believe it is legitimate. This is precisely why he calls the terrorists "shahids" and pays salaries to their families.
The members of the Joint List mostly adhere to this narrative, and it is the basis for their claims and deeds. This is why when their lawmakers call Samir Kuntar a shahid it is not a one-time slip of the tongue or pen. However, there is no denying that the adoption of the Palestinian narrative by members of the Joint List opens a wide gap between those who support them and the Israeli public. The Arab public in Israel supports the Joint List not necessarily because it blindly accepts its platform, but because it is the only political force that represents it and pretends to take care of its needs. This fact is testimony to the failure of the Zionist parties to recruit and integrate the Arabs in Israel.
Integrating Arab Israelis into all aspects of Israeli life, as citizens with equal rights and obligations, is the way to bridge the gap and push the Palestinian narrative from the discourse of Israeli Arabs to the fringes.
