Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat who died Monday was laid to rest in Jericho on Wednesday afternoon as elsewhere in the Palestinian Authority, they marked the 16 anniversary of the death of former PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat.
Arafat is widely credited for making the Palestinian issue a part of the international community's agenda, complete with the Palestinian demand that any future state would include east Jerusalem as its capital.
Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter
It was Arafat who put forward the demand for a just solution for hundreds of thousands of second- and third-generation Palestinian refugees living worldwide, as well as for those living in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
One has to wonder whether, under Arafat, the Palestinian leadership would have acted differently following the 1993 Oslo Accords, which Erekat helped outline? Could his leadership had guaranteed the millions of Palestinians living in the territories a comfortable life in an independent state?
Quite a few academics, politicians, military officials and defense experts, past and present, have tried to answer this question, but it seems that the issue will stands – at least until a just and fair solution is found to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The recent Abraham accords can serve as a prism through which the issue can be reviewed as it would be through Palestinian and Arab eyes.
Mere days after the Avraham Accords were inked, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas demanded the Arab League convene an urgent session and pass a resolution condemning the agreements, which he claimed made no mention of the Palestinian issue.
Arafat expressed similar anger when Egypt signed the peace agreement with Israel in the late 1970s.
The Palestinians also fumed because, in something of a break from policy, Arab rulers did not rush to condemn the Abraham Accords or sympathize with the Palestinian sense of victimhood. The United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Sudan were not shunned by the Arab League as Egypt was in the wake of the 1979 peace deal.
Moreover, the majority of Arab nations did not protest the deals, nor did they rush to defend the "national Palestinian interest."
The Palestinian leadership, from Arafat to Abbas, has failed to read the map of regional inserts. Arab states are looking to the future and only the Palestinian issue remains entrenched in the past.
Current Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit tried to appease the Palestinians' fury over the League's indifference, by pointing to the fact that the deal sought to prevent Israel's plan to extend sovereignty to parts of Judea and Samaria and the Jordan Valley from taking place.
He suggested that, given the new regional circumstances, the Palestinian resume peace talks with Israel, regardless of whether US President Donald Trump is re-elected.
The Palestinian refused to listen and Erekat even called on Gheit to resign over his "disgraceful and criminal support of the Abraham Accords."
So in fact, the man rushed to an Israeli hospital in critical condition, where doctors fought for his life for over three weeks, had actively attempted to undermine the Abraham Accords, all while successful selling the Israeli Left on his image as a peace-loving ideologist.
Perhaps it was no coincidence that the Palestinians chose the anniversary of Arafat's death to bury Erekat – the chief negotiator with Israel.
If the Palestinian truly seek a just, lasting peace, one that would make the Middle East a better place, then they would be wise to bury their obstinacy as well. The continued lack of pragmatism will get them nowhere.
Subscribe to Israel Hayom's daily newsletter and never miss our top stories!
