Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge. The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev. Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts. The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles. In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience. The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter. “The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services. Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il

Ronit Dror

Ronit Dror, PhD, is a clinical social worker and activist on issues of gender equality, domestic violence, and parental alienation.

A position of strength

International Women's Day is a great opportunity to celebrate the achievements of the feminist revolution, one of the most important, if not the most important, revolutions of my generation. We can proudly say that we women have achieved equality of rights and opportunities, independence and power in the familial and public space.

The disparity between the sexes, which in the past was biased against women, has led to the establishment of powerful feminist organizations, the passing of legislation and increased public awareness that have dramatically changed the balance of power between the sexes in Western society. If there is a disparity between men and women, it is usually the result of personal choice and not the dictate of society. If she has the necessary skills and ability, a woman can now aspire to be whatever she desires. The issue of domestic violence, once the banner of the feminist revolution, has also noted significant achievements through like the establishment of centers for battered women and the public consensus that there should be zero tolerance for any form of violence against women.

Just as with the other movements that achieved their goals and realized their visions, the feminist movement should have lauded its achievements with pride and renounced its victim narrative.

But because making such a statement would eradicate the political and economic power of the female lobby, they have found a new mantra and that is the harming of men. Today, as it currently stands, the feminist revolution is mainly concerned with gender rights, not human rights. For example, despite research indicating men suffer from domestic violence, we concern ourselves only with violence perpetrated against women, instead of focusing on violence in general. It seems the working assumption of those who continue to claim discrimination is that if things are bad for men, they will be better for women. Campaigns like #MeToo pop up with the aim of "re-educating" the masculine gender. If in the past, we women fought for our right to be heard and to prevent victimization, today we have become the victimizers.

This campaign of delegitimization has not passed over the government and judicial institutions responsible for creating the discriminatory laws against men. No lawmaker, minister or judge wants to be responsible for making a decision or remaining silent on the subject of the protection of women and then learn another woman has been abused or God forbid murdered.

So, while the victimhood narrative could be understood at the outset of the feminist revolution when it was necessary to better women's standing in society, today we must ask: Is this narrative still necessary? Will we necessarily have it good if men have it bad? Although the feminist movement has done much to open doors and shatter glass ceilings for women, we should now contemplate a new path, a path in which we renounce our weakened position, encourage women to take responsibility for their own lives, speak out when they face discrimination, file a police complaint when they are abused and work harder and with determination to get wherever they want to be.

Related Posts