Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge. The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev. Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts. The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles. In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience. The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter. “The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services. Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il

Benjamin Weil

Benjamin Weil is the former director of the Project for Israel’s National Security for the Endowment for Middle East Truth (EMET), a pro-Israel and pro-American think tank and policy institute in Washington, DC.

The president has it all wrong on Iran

While the "maximum pressure" campaign may not have achieved its ultimate goal, it kept Iran in check. The Biden administration's approach seems to be achieving the exact opposite.

 

In recent weeks, the breaking news notifications on my cellphone have switched from reports about the next Muslim or Arab country to normalize relations with Israel to Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia and Shi'ite militia attacking US targets in Iraq. The commonality between the two groups of militias is their backing by Iran. How surprising is it that these attacks, along with Iranian threats, have increased since the new White House declared its intent to adopt a new foreign policy in the Middle East?

Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter 

The criticism of former President Donald Trump's "maximum pressure" campaign was that it did not lead Iran to the negotiation table and did not eliminate the Iranian nuclear threat. Nor did it eradicate Iranian sponsorship of terrorism across the Middle East. Although not much has changed on the ground so far, US President Joe Biden's intent to roll back Trump's policy can already be felt across the region. His "maximum pleasure" campaign towards Iran has only led to destabilization and an uptick in violence.

Biden has been rewarding the Iranians and receiving nothing other than hostility in return. One of his first actions was to remove the terrorist designation of the Houthis. How did they respond? Within 24 hours, they attacked Saudi Arabia. Using Iranian-made drones and rockets, the Houthis have increased their attacks on Saudi airports, energy infrastructure and cities. Since January, the Iranians have installed dozens of advanced centrifuges, threatened to enrich uranium at a 40% or 60% level, restricted accesses for IAEA inspectors, began producing uranium metal and tested a ballistic missile in disguise as a satellite launch. The Iranians have even mobilized their Iraqi militia to attack US assets and kill American personnel.

While the pressure campaign may not have achieved its ultimate goal, it kept Iran in check. Biden's approach seems to be achieving the exact opposite. How would his authorization to release $3 billion of Iranian assets in Iraq, Oman and South Korea do any good?

When the Kuwaiti media recently reported that the Biden administration has asked Israel to refrain from striking Iranian assets in Syria – claiming that they have assurances from the Iranians to pull out their forces from Syria – I couldn't believe what I was reading. If the Iranians pull out their forces from Syria, Israel would have no reason to attack. The Biden administration has gotten everything wrong; instead of treating the problem, it is treating the symptom. That, I believe, is the biggest flaw in his Middle East policy so far – a distorted view of the region leading to a misperception of what is cause and what is effect.

Just look at how we have treated our allies: Israel and Saudi Arabia. One of the most important virtues in the Middle East is respect. It took Biden almost a month to acknowledge his Israeli and Saudi counterparts, keeping them in the dark and signaling that they are not so crucial. In the process, he managed to snub the Saudi crown prince – the future Saudi king. It seems that the United States is interested in negotiating a nuclear deal with Iran without taking into consideration Israel and Saudi Arabia, the two major forces in the region and under direct Iranian threat.

Subscribe to Israel Hayom's daily newsletter and never miss our top stories!

This reversed logic is thematic. Biden chooses to disregard Iran's long "laundry list" of bad behavior and to appease them in hopes to gain one gesture, while penalizing Saudi Arabia, a close ally that largely benefits the United States, despite its egregious record on human rights, which can equally be said about Iran. That's not how you treat an ally.

I would advise this administration to stop its current campaign. Do not cave to Tehran's demands of US concessions before it rolls back its nuclear program of enrichment, missiles and warheads. In the meantime, the "maximum pressure" campaign might not get us anywhere, but unlike the "maximum pleasure" campaign, it won't take us to places we don't want to go.

Reprinted with permission from JNS.org.

 

 

 

Related Posts