Israel Hayom is a media organization founded on the belief that the Israeli public deserves better journalism—more balanced, more accurate, and more reliable. Journalism that speaks rather than shouts. Journalism that is trustworthy, objective, and matter-of-fact. A different kind of journalism, offered free of charge. The first print edition was published on July 30, 2007, and in 2010 Israel Hayom became the Israeli newspaper with the highest weekday readership. The newspaper’s publisher is Dr. Miriam Adelson. Its Editor-in-Chief is Omar Lachmanovitch, and its founding editor is Amos Regev. Israel Hayom’s Hebrew and English websites, as well as its Android and iOS applications, provide around-the-clock news coverage, exclusive content, breaking news and updates, analysis and commentary, video, podcasts, and live broadcasts. The digital platforms of Israel Hayom include news and opinion channels covering culture and entertainment, lifestyle, technology, sports, business and consumer affairs, health, military affairs, food, Judaism, tourism, and automobiles. In 2021, a new Hebrew-language website and mobile application were launched to provide users with a fast, up-to-date, secure, and convenient experience. The content of the newspaper’s print edition is also available online through a daily digital edition and can be received via newsletter. “The Israel Hayom Clique,” the publication’s exclusive benefits club, offers website users discounts and special promotions on products and services. Israel Hayom welcomes feedback, criticism, and suggestions for improvement from its readers. You can contact the organization by email at hayom@israelhayom.co.il

Ken Abramowitz

Ken Abramowitz is chairman of Citizens for National Security.

World War III has already begun

There is no compatibility between the national objectives of Iran and the United States or their interests in the global theater. Either one or the other can prevail, but not both.

World War III, the conflict we now, unfortunately, find ourselves in, is far more complex and confusing than World War II.

A good example for that is America's principal enemy, Iran (supported by Russia, China, and the European Union), which declared war on America 40 years ago and continuously preaches genocide against the United States ("Death to America!") and Israel ("Death to Israel!").

Numerous US federal courts have ruled that Iran's leaders "provided material support" to al-Qaida for the purpose of carrying out the 9/11 attacks, imposed judgments of tens of billions of dollars on them, and ordered U.S.-based properties owned by the Islamic republic to be seized and auctioned off to pay off these and other judgments.

 Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter

As the aggressor, Iran relatively successfully uses all six forms of modern warfare: physical, cultural, economic, legal, demographic and cyber. It has created three worldwide terror arms, specializing in physical terrorism, narco-terrorism, and cultural terrorism, with an estimated 450,000 terrorist/operatives in over 30 countries.

Reacting defensively, the United States is fighting back primarily with economic warfare, some cyber warfare and very limited physical warfare, the latter mostly through passive shows of force. The United States has yet to employ cultural, legal or demographic warfare against Iran.

What is going on here, and why the mismatch of strategies between us and them?

The key reason is that Iran is a dictatorship that speaks and acts with one voice. In contrast, the United States is a democracy that speaks and acts with multiple voices, and disparate actions that create huge mutual confusion.

Iran's goal is to take over the world and convert everyone to Islam, particularly its Shiite version, using all forms of warfare. America's goal, in contrast, is to live in peace and prosperity, while encouraging all democracies (50% of the global population) and dictatorships (the other 50%) to join in worldwide economic growth.

There is no compatibility between these two national objectives. Either one or the other can prevail, but not both.

Therefore, we find ourselves in World War III, even though we don't want to be, don't think we are and don't even want to consider the possibility we might be.

The trick now is to create a winning strategy.

Reprinted with permission from JNS.org.

Related Posts