The notion born this week, and already gaining traction, is that the Lebanese government will somehow guarantee the security of residents in northern Israel. But there is an opening for a historic strategic shift, and it can be summed up in two words: border adjustments.
On the eve of Holocaust Remembrance Day, "never again" demands a trial that links the Nukhba terrorists to the long-standing Palestinian plan to destroy us.
For years, Israelis were told that Hungary’s prime minister was an antisemitic tyrant, mainly as a way to attack Benjamin Netanyahu through him. His immediate and gracious concession in the election proves the exact opposite. Now, as our best friend in Europe is on his way out, Israel has real cause for concern.
The litmus test for the Pakistan talks will be whether Iran is stripped of its nuclear capabilities. Any other outcome would grant the regime dangerous immunity. At the same time, negotiations with Lebanon are at a crossroads: can Beirut break free of Hezbollah’s stranglehold?
The sense of unease accompanying the war’s impressive achievements stems from the impression that the long-awaited change in Iran was within reach, yet the ceasefire pushed it further away and helped the regime rise from the ropes. Israel must now push for two critical decisions: No easing of economic sanctions on Iran, and no restrictions on Israel’s freedom of action.
While others scrambled for relevance, Pakistan – sidelined, indebted, and overlooked – quietly positioned itself at the center of the Middle East's new order.
The ceasefire left Israel without diplomatic gains and without a response to its main threats. The gap between military success and the actual outcome heightens the risk of further escalation. At the same time, criticism is mounting over the government's conduct and its impact on Israel's standing on the international stage.
After months of boasts that the threat had been pushed back for years, Israel is ending 40 days of fighting without a decisive outcome. The very ceasefire will force it to pay a heavy price, one that could come due if the war resumes. At the same time, the question of Lebanon remains unanswered, and not a single Israeli official sees fit to provide the public with answers.
Iran’s regime believes time is working against Trump more than against itself, and therefore prefers to continue the war of attrition and pay in cash to secure gains down the road. To prevent that, Trump must take decisive steps he has so far avoided, including destroying Iran’s national infrastructure.
As Europe shrugs off the Iranian threat, the old fantasy that aggression can be contained without confrontation is proving dangerous once again.
